Another stunning example of the Right's hypocrisy

Forums:

stunning.png

I guess in my world of bad info. and fake news I was unaware this practice was happening. Is there any proof, and from what sources?

 

If true, I also guess it's OK with "the Left" or just everyone, including you, King?

 

The source is a whistle-blower complaint from a nurse who worked at the ICE facility where it happened. 

>>>>> I also guess it's OK with "the Left" or just everyone

Wrong. Why would you guess that?

Because The King is indicting "the right", but apparently no one with knowledge is doing anything. The unoriginal pic is used to "throw stones", but only in one direction, which I'm curious about.

 

Were you aware of this?

^everybody is aware of this now, after the whistleblower nurse came forward. 

the dems approve and fund ICE along w/ the GOP. 

ICE needs to be abolished. 

>>>OP

Yep. I agree with that. 

>>Because The King is indicting "the right"

No, sir. I am pointing out their hypocrisy. That's not the same thing.
And the left shows very little hypocrisy on this issue.

And the left has ZERO control over ICE at the moment.

>>ICE needs to be abolished. 
Indeed!

^^ That's bullshit, 6. 

 

Keep working some semantic's.

How is it bullshit?

Many on the right SAY they are pro-life yet are not bothered by this practice - mainly because it is being done on brown and black "illegals".

That is textbook hypocrisy. Unless what they really are is pro WHITE life. Then it would not be so hypocritical - it would just be racist.

So, "very little" is better than "full on"?  OK.

 

 

"Very little" can possibly be educated and changed - "full on" is pretty much FULL ON.

What's worse is that forced hysterectomies are legally forms of genocide. Someone's truly fucked if he faces justice. 

Earl, I often rip on Six, but he's correct here. 

who will hold trump responsible? 

if obama and co didn't hold W accountable for his war crimes and crimes against humanity, why would they trump? 

often?

often?

occsasionally?

hmm...

>>who will hold trump responsible? 

other inmates once he has been convicted of tax fraud?

occasionally

I feel the love, bruh

>>>>>once he has been convicted of tax fraud?

>>>>>>And the left has ZERO control

 

 

The left has some control over the courts

Love the irony of the "King of the Vaginas" posting about women's rights.

It has a certain faire about it, no?  a certain je ne sais quoi?

Je ne parle pas francais. I don't know what it has, but it put a grin on my face.

And while we're at it, what the hell is Laura of the Butthurt and the punks thing? I must've missed the origin of all that.

the senate still pushing through all trump judges. 

dems voting yes yes yes. 

there are a few dems who voted no. 

complicit. 

>>And while we're at it, what the hell is Laura of the Butthurt and the punks thing? I must've missed the origin of all that.

Floops exposed me as King of the Pussies, Lord of the Butthurt and the Disgrace of Punks everywhere - so I changed my hadle to that. Then it morphed into the current form when I was bored a few days later. Yes, people are dying, that's true. It is what it is. But that doesn't mean we aren't doing everything we can. It's under control as much as you can control it.

As hypocritical as it may be, I think it does a disservice to frame it in such terms.

What is going on now with Trump and his minions is a stand alone assault upon our Republic and our individual freedoms that needs no basis of comparison to know its patently wrong; let alone fodder to keep their "whataboutism" merry go around spinning.

Gotcha, 6. I thought it might have been Lord of the Butthurt, not that you've ever given me a reason to think that.

Edit: Stay focused people. Trump has to go and then everything else can be dealt with by our business-as-usual, corporate-funded, deeply-flawed form of governing.

I have my detractors here mikeedwards, but I soldier on. lol

And Fuck Trump 

I thought all your detractors had been vanquished, MikeW-style. Do any still remain?

The Senate confirmed three more judges for Trump today. The only senators to vote NO on all three:

Blumenthal
Gillibrand
Markey
Warren

(Harris and Sanders were absent.) :( 

I'm not a vanquisher. I'm more of an absurdist.

so 4 dems outta how many?

pathetic.

 

^truly. 

how do you call the guy a fascist and that he's the worst thing ever to happen to america, and vote for all his military budgets and vote to approve all of his federal judges. 

wild. 

biden is the pick b/c the oligarchs know he won't move left after trump is gone. 

pretty obvious. 

going back to "normal" isn't good enough b/c that's what got us here. the normal before trump was totally fucked as well. 

that's why it's be smart for biden to start endorsing progressive policy, and not just attempting to court moderate republicans. 

risky stuff from the old man imo. 

> the normal before trump was totally fucked as well.

I agree that what we had before Trump was fucked up, but what we have going on now is much worse than what things were like before him.

<<that's why it's be smart for biden to start endorsing progressive policy, and not just attempting to court moderate republicans. 

 

good point. completely agree. 

The Progressive Activist Begging the Left to Stop Owning Itself

Sean McElwee has a simple message for his compatriots: Rigid doctrinarianism doesn’t win elections.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/09/joe-biden-sean-mcel...

King of the Vaginas?

Seems to me that would mean you are the ruler of all vaginas. I betting you can live with that burden. . 


>>> The Senate confirmed three more judges for Trump today. The only senators to vote NO on all three:

Blumenthal
Gillibrand
Markey
Warren

(Harris and Sanders were absent.) :(  <<<

 

>>> biden is the pick b/c the oligarchs know he won't move left after trump is gone. 

pretty obvious. <<<

 

of the 2 posts above 

one is true

one is false

 

you decide.

 

 

What's the word on the street about bernie being absent?

I know Harris is doing this VP thing, but bernie?

is he alright?

 

I do know one thing, he was absent also on that russian sanctions vote...


 

strange indeed

 

 

^funny you don't even see the connection. 

but, russia. 

sad. 

 

yep, the connection has been known for sometime.

 


 


you should really check out the covid plan bernie is supporting.

it's simple...

go to biden's website.

 

to think he did all that from his basement, wow

 

 

 

<<but, russia. 

poor old sensible reagan republican, dan coats, is basically having a nervous breakdown right now, he's so worried about russia in the next 50 days and the senate's inaction. not sure if dan coats has ever had a nervous breakdown in his life, until now. 

john brennan said today that he's more worried now then he's ever been. also said that bill barr, his henchman and Ron Johnson don't have the balls to call to him to capitol hill to testify. he basically said bring it you pussies.  

michael steele has lost all fucks to give and is literally swearing on national television, pleading for people to see past the disinformation and vote. 

shit feels like its getting real-real. 


 

>>> but, russia <<<

 

who brought up russian oligarchs?

 

you

 

I think that ogkb is talking about the American oligarchs.

fuck me. 

Lube or no lube?


an oligarch is an oligarch, correct

but russian oligarchs definitely don't have a place in this

i digress

 


forgot the proverbial

 

smh

 

Wow -- All you guys have Vaginas,  and also Been To Russia !!

I'm sort of impressed,  but not really.

Which is your favorite drive-through,  Burger King or White Castle ??

Do you lick your Televisions ?


 

relax man, you alright?

 


got gigs of old zoner quotes

 

who does... nvm

Ron Johnson?!

Ron Johnson Fast Times.jpg

>>got gigs of old zoner quotes

seems like a very creepy thing to "collect", but whatever

Just a note on the Trump judges -- the "blue slip" tradition is still honored for district court judges (vs. federal appeals courts, McConnell ditched it for those), meaning that both senators in the state where the judge will sit have to sign off before their nomination can go forward. So when you see Trump-nominated judges in states like NY, IL, CA, MD, those nominations were signed off on by two Dem senators beforehand, meaning they're much more likely to not be terrible. That's the reason you see bipartisan support on the final votes for many of the judges recently, as opposed to the Federalist Society wackos they put on the federal appeals courts, who almost all Dems voted against almost every time. Obviously it would be better if you had a Dem president appointing all the judges and a Dem Senate confirming them, but seeing Dems going along on blue state district court nominations right now is not itself a sign that they're rolling over or showing true conservative colors.

 They obviously don't take this shit seriously when they think no one will notice. Let's see how many Democrats fold so trump can get his SCJ in.

There's nothing they can do. There's no folding when the other guy already has a royal flush.

Tell that to Garland.

... what does that mean. Dems didn't have control of the Senate then either

They need to work harder to earn votes so this shit doesn't happen. They're clearly not the resistance when they vote in favor of trump judges, or don't even bother to show up to vote him down when they do have a say..

Yay Harris, yay Sanders wtf

^^ it means the duopoly is working just fine. 


>>> They're clearly not the resistance when they vote in favor of trump judges, <<<


the republifucks ram judges through with 50 votes (they have 53)

dems have 47

 

math is hard

 

It's hard for Dems. Majorities are above the law. 

 

>>> It's hard for Dems. Majorities are above the law. <<<

 

the "minority" is in power

 

the 47 dems in the senate represent 18 million more people than the 53 republicans

 

we solve that by giving DC and PR statehood by adding 4 more senators 

 

 

math is hard

 

What crimes could you charge the Republicans of today? 

Will they be charged by the Democrat majority?


>>> What crimes could you charge the Republicans of today? 

       Will they be charged by the Democrat majority? <<<

 

Sealioning (also spelled sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment which consists of pursuing people with persistent requests for evidence or repeated questions, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity. It may take the form of "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate".

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

 

Nobody is above the law unless they have an advantage. 

 

 


 

>>> Nobody is above the law unless they have an advantage. <<<

 

you just figured that out?

 

It all comes down to Thod's one vote. 

trump sings and stickers out number biden like 10:1 here...

lacker is lacking these days

<<<>>>trump sings and stickers out number biden like 10:1 here...

same here.

was the same thing in 2016 (philadelphia)

Wait a second - Trump sings? What? Show tunes?