Who's really running the show? Cambridge Analytica: psychops
Forums:
Worth a read (reality, it appears, is like like a spy novel - hedge fund billionaires, military-industrial complex, data mining......):
"There are three strands to this story.
How the foundations of an authoritarian surveillance state are being laid in the US.
How British democracy was subverted through a covert, far-reaching plan of coordination enabled by a US billionaire.
And how we are in the midst of a massive land grab for power by billionaires via our data. Data which is being silently amassed, harvested and stored."
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-bre...
"Cambridge Analytica.....He called the company a central point in the right’s “propaganda machine”, a line I quoted in reference to its work for the Trump election campaign and the referendum Leave campaign. That led to the second article featuring Cambridge Analytica – as a central node in the alternative news and information network that I believed Robert Mercer and Steve Bannon, the key Trump aide who is now his chief strategist, were creating. I found evidence suggesting they were on a strategic mission to smash the mainstream media and replace it with one comprising alternative facts, fake history and rightwing propaganda."
- Log in to post comments
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Alan R
"This is not just a story
"This is not just a story about social psychology and data analytics. It has to be understood in terms of a military contractor using military strategies on a civilian population. Us. David Miller, a professor of sociology at Bath University and an authority in psyops and propaganda, says it is “an extraordinary scandal that this should be anywhere near a democracy. It should be clear to voters where information is coming from, and if it’s not transparent or open where it’s coming from, it raises the question of whether we are actually living in a democracy or not.”
Paul and David, another ex-Cambridge Analytica employee, were working at the firm when it introduced mass data-harvesting to its psychological warfare techniques. “It brought psychology, propaganda and technology together in this powerful new way,” David tells me."
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Alan R
"This is military-funded
"This is military-funded technology that has been harnessed by a global plutocracy and is being used to sway elections in ways that people can’t even see, don’t even realise is happening to them,” she says. “It’s about exploiting existing phenomenon like nationalism and then using it to manipulate people at the margins. To have so much data in the hands of a bunch of international plutocrats to do with it what they will is absolutely chilling.
“We are in an information war and billionaires are buying up these companies, which are then employed to go to work in the heart of government. That’s a very worrying situation.”
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Alias
Been following this for over
Been following this for over a year. Here is another story that describes what they do, although it is too obsessed with a possible "Russia connection". Russia is not the point, and Cambridge will not be the only company to do this, although with Mergers skills and backing they are the best at it. At the end of the day, people have to start being less susceptible to targeted brain training or out entire civilization will be lost. It might already be. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/16/15657512/cambridge-an...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Glad this stuff is finally
Glad this stuff is finally getting traction.
This is been know for about a year.
Whistleblower Christopher Wylie, describes how firm linked to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon compiled user data to target American voters.
“We exploited Facebook to harvest millions of people’s profiles. And built models to exploit what we knew about them and target their inner demons. That was the basis that the entire company was built on.”
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-faceboo...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
What do we do about this?
What do we do about this?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
>What do we do about this?
>What do we do about this?
we go to a booth every 2 years and push some buttons
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
>> What do we do about this?
>> What do we do about this?
Keep posting personal information about yourself and your family.
Pretend it doesn't matter and has nothing to do with you.
Come up with a way to use a "breathing apparatus" while head is buried in the sand and make a shit ton of jing.
or....
Dump Facebook.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
https://www.youtube.com/watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v533hYhfxQE
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger
Why are rich republicans so
Why are rich republicans so anti-America?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
What info about me is being
What info about me is being used?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: 19.5 Degrees
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/17/politics/facebook-cambridge-analytica/ind...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: smiley
data has bee weaponized by
data has bee weaponized by both sides for a long time.
people are easily herded, as it turns out.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
>>>>>Pretend it doesn't
>>>>>Pretend it doesn't matter and has nothing to do with you.
What did I do?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: nebulous nelly
^Don't be coy, Slack, you
^Don't be coy, Slack, you know what you did
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
I "liked" some pics on
I "liked" some pics on Facebook.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger
>>>>people are easily herded,
>>>>people are easily herded, as it turns out
yes, they are. it wasn’t very long ago that actual real thinking people thought that Hillary Clinton was running a pedophile ring out of the basement of a pizza parlor.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: An organ grinder’s tune
can thom tell us again that
can thom tell us again that liberals are ruining everything?
fucking scary article.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger
The GOP has sold their party
The GOP has sold their party and our country out to Donald fucking Trump. Way to go.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Alias
What you do is recognize it
What you do is recognize it so that you can check yourself and your news sources. Read news from multiple sources. Form opinions outside of social media.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
>yes, they are. it wasn’t
>yes, they are. it wasn’t very long ago that actual real thinking people thought that Hillary Clinton was running a pedophile ring out of the basement of a pizza parlor
lol
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius
"Why are rich republicans so
"Why are rich republicans so anti-America?"
Why are people on the Zone so susceptible to bullshit?
Hillary lost because she's Hillary. It really isn't any more complicated than that. If Joe Biden had run he'd be President now (assuming that the DNC wouldn't have rigged the results against him like they did with Bernie). But of course the left's certainty of the stupidity of the average human (especially ones that don't think "the right way") as well as their conceit that if they lose there must be some nefarious plot to explain it always has to find an outlet.
And I'd say that the Obama administrations use of our intelligence services to try and destroy a duly elected President is pretty much the definition of "anti-American".
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Druba
(No subject)
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
bring it thom bring it
bring it thom bring it
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Alan R
Not a leftie vs rightie issue
Not a leftie vs rightie issue: about big money and personal data collection and the science of human behavior:
"massive land grab for power by billionaires via our data. Data which is being silently amassed, harvested and stored."
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Thumbkinetic
Poor Thom. Such a thool.
Poor Thom.
Such a thool.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: An organ grinder’s tune
thom is cool with oligarchs
thom is cool with oligarchs and plutocrats.
corporations are people.
money is free speech.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: jeff
thom's brain has been
thom's brain has been scrambled, shaken and taken over by the Russian propaganda machine. he spouts the exact same company line as the bots that flood the facebook comment sections of the NY Times.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger
We won’t even get any good
We won’t even get any good music out of this because millennials suck
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: _
>> corporations are people.
>> corporations are people.
This concept predates the republican and democratic parties. See Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819).
Why do think the Democratic party opposes that interpretation?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius
So what I read in that
So what I read in that article is a lot of descriptions of how data was collected but not one example of how it supposedly was used to alter the election other than a brief reference to Facebook ads. Not one concrete example. The insinuation is that all of this data was collected in order to target people to make them think better of Trump, but I don't see one actual example of how that was actually done. What I see are theories that since this guy was bullied as a kid that he must have been uniquely vulnerable to to these right wing bullies as well.
Which brings up the much larger issue; is it really believable that the election was swayed but Facebook ads? This is ridiculous. Trump was all over every network 24/7 for 18 months (a decision that many of the networks probably now regret), he couldn't send a tweet without it being broadcast everywhere, outrage after outrage ad nauseam, and you folks decide to believe that Facebook ads were the culprit? This is desperation searching for an answer at best.
Big data is here to stay and it's use in all sorts of areas is only going to continue, for good and for ill. The idea that it won't be used to affect elections is naive in the extreme. Obama was doing this to the capability they had at the time, they regularly bragged about their expertise in using social media, but since you liked him you didn't see it as a problem.
Madison believed a fully informed electorate was necessary for a well-functioning democracy. If you're using Facebook to get your information you are pretty much by definition not even close to being fully informed. And you're also not the reason that Hillary lost.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger
Don’t worry Thom, in due time
Don’t worry Thom, in due time all of the details will come out and you’ll stop having to try to figure out why all of this is bad for our country.
Dosvedanya
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
I always thought that the
I always thought that the primary goal of government is to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
Which one are you?
Which one are you?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
i'm not a bar room
i'm not a bar room philosopher like some people i know
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
The hack of the DNC emails.
The hack of the DNC emails.
The stealing of 50 Million people's personal info and weaponize to be used against them.
The hacking of our infrastructure (Nuclear and Electric)
Putin spent $1.2 Million a MONTH on Russian bots and troll farms.
This was a 3 prong Cyber Warfare attack on our Country and Democracy.
You cool with that Thom?
How about you Hillman??
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
Everyone needs to be on the
Everyone needs to be on the same page. It's the deadhead way.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: thinthread
dnc spent a billion a month &
dnc spent a billion a month & actually rigged the election against bernie sanders. doubt russia did any damage. how much does the usa spend interfering with other countries elections? and if you say we don't do that you are very naive.
trump's digital campaign manager brad parscale gave 60 minutes an interview last year that explained exactly how the use of this data was used. i even posted about it the day after the interview when all this uproar over collusion was raging. it's not a secret.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
>>> dnc spent a billion a
>>> dnc spent a billion a month & actually rigged the election against bernie sanders.
Source? Link?? ^^
I mean, that's huge news so that shouldn't be a problem right?
I'll address Parscale after the Bernie thing response.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Def. High
Parties can decide how to
Parties can decide how to pick their candidates.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: thinthread
you think the dnc didn't rig
you think the dnc didn't tamper with the primary to keep bernie from getting the nomination????? a billion was hyperbole (which never happens on this site lol) as total spending was $6.5 billion. Per party it was closer to $38.6 million a month for dems & the repug side spent $20.06 million a month.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/04/14/somebody-just-put...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Hillman here's what you said:
Hillman here's what you said:
"dnc spent a billion a month & actually rigged the election against bernie sanders."
4 billion went to congressional races (Primaries and General)
2.5 billion was spent on the Presidential race.
That INCLUDES 16 Republicans!
Plus Clinton,Sanders,Stein and Johnson.
Now go read that again.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: thinthread
i have the amount spent by
i have the amount spent by each party on the presidential election listed above, as well as the $6.5 billion spent in total on all elections.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
>>> doubt russia did any
>>> doubt russia did any damage. how much does the usa spend interfering with other countries elections? and if you say we don't do that you are very naive.
So you're cool with:
The hack of the DNC emails.
The stealing of 50 Million people's personal info and weaponize to be used against them.
The hacking of our infrastructure (Nuclear and Electric) and Putin spending $1.2 Million a MONTH on Russian bots and troll farms.
Because we do it in other Countries?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: thinthread
i think the entire country
i think the entire country needs to upgrade cyber security across the board for govt & private applications, it is sorely ineffective today. also need to do major electrical grid infrastructure upgrades to prevent emp & cme's from damaging it. if we lose electricity that would leave us helpless for who knows how long. that is not a question of if, but when.
don't know who hacked experian to the tune of 140+million people's information but haven't heard that it was the russians. hacking is not the sole purview of the russian govt. but hey, the 1980's are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back. because the cold war has been over for 20 years.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
The President of the United
The President of the United States has done nothing to condemn it.
Is that good for us?
Going for a hike.
I'll check back later.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius
So what do we learn in the NY
So what do we learn in the NY Times today?
Not much.
The most interesting piece of information is that "Mr. Wylie" had connections to the Obama political machine, which makes it sensible to assume that he had no problem using this technology as long as it was being employed by those whose views he was in favor of. It was only after he became disenchanted "with working on behalf of the hard-right candidates" that his conscious seems to have kicked in. (BTW, are there ever any "hard left candidates" in the Times' world?).
Again, not one specific instance as to how this technology was actually employed by the Trump campaign to tilt the election. In fact, there are multiple claims that "Cambridge did not have enough time to comprehensively model Trump voters". The main claim appears to be that the data was gathered in a questionable method. That may be (and it may not), but it hardly shows how the data was employed in any manner to affect the outcome of the election.
Desperation searching for an answer. Occam's Razor people. The Democrats ran a terrible candidate and paid the price. Like I said; if Joe Biden had run he'd be President today. And don't think he doesn't know it.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger
Unfortunately this has
Unfortunately this has nothing to do with the Democrats running a horrible candidate, it has to do with the republicans nominating and electing a candidate who has been compromised by Russia.
One that acts REALLY GUILTY btw.
I can’t wait for all of this to play out ITS GOING TO BE FUCKING AWESOME.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: An organ grinder’s tune
this isn't about hillary thom
this isn't about hillary thom.
the only people that are still hung up on hillary and obamma are nutballs.
this was about sinister right wing (fascists), using this technology to move brittan out of the EU. this was accomplished by psychological manipulation of tageted ads to tip the scales and get the outcome they want.
do the dems and others use the same tech? sure, of course. they just don't have ideological billionaires honing it to the point of weaponization.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
lol
lol
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Oaksterdam Dan
Facebook says it has
Facebook says it has suspended the account of Cambridge Analytica, the data analysis firm hired by Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, amid reports it harvested the profile information of millions of US voters without their permission.
According to the New York Times and Britain's Observer, the company stole information from 50 million Facebook users' profiles in the tech giant's biggest-ever data breach, to help them design software to predict and influence voters' choices at the ballot box.
Also suspended were the accounts of its parent organization, Strategic Communication Laboratories, as well as those of University of Cambridge psychologist Aleksandr Kogan and Christopher Wylie, a Canadian data analytics expert who worked with Kogan.
Cambridge Analytica was bankrolled to the tune of $15 million by US hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, a major Republican donor. The Observer said it was headed at the time by Steve Bannon, a top Trump adviser until he was fired last summer.
"In 2015, we learned that ... Kogan lied to us and violated our Platform Policies by passing data from an app that was using Facebook Login to SCL/Cambridge Analytica, a firm that does political, government and military work around the globe," Facebook said in a posting late Friday by its vice president and deputy general counsel Paul Grewal.
Kogan also improperly shared the data with Wylie, it said.
Kogan's app, thisisyourdigitallife, offered a personality prediction test, describing itself on Facebook as "a research app used by psychologists."
Some 270,000 people downloaded the app, allowing Kogan to access information such as the city listed on their profile, or content they had "liked."
"However, the app also collected the information of the test-takers' Facebook friends, leading to the accumulation of a data pool tens of millions-strong," the Observer reported.
Facebook later pushed back against the claim of a data breach, issuing a fresh statement on Saturday that suggested the misused data was limited to those who voluntarily took the test.
"People knowingly provided their information, no systems were infiltrated, and no passwords or sensitive pieces of information were stolen or hacked," Grewal said.
Cambridge Analytica meanwhile said it was in touch with Facebook "in order to resolve this matter as quickly as possible."
It blamed the misuse of data on Kogan and said it has since deleted all the data it received from a company he founded, Global Science Research (GSR).
"No data from GSR was used by Cambridge Analytica as part of the services it provided to the Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign," it said.
- 'Targeting their inner demons' -
But Wylie, who later became a whistleblower, told the Observer: "We exploited Facebook to harvest millions of people's profiles. And built models to exploit what we knew about them and target their inner demons. That was the basis that the entire company was built on."
Kogan legitimately obtained the information but "violated platform policies" by passing information to SCL/Cambridge Analytica and Wylie, according to Facebook.
Facebook said it removed the app in 2015 when it learned of the violation, and was told by Kogan and everyone who received the data that it had since been destroyed.
"Several days ago, we received reports that, contrary to the certifications we were given, not all data was deleted," Grewal wrote.
"We are moving aggressively to determine the accuracy of these claims. If true, this is another unacceptable violation of trust and the commitments they made.
"We are suspending SCL/Cambridge Analytica, Wylie and Kogan from Facebook, pending further information."
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
BWA HAAAHAAAAAHA HHHHAAAAA!!!
BWA HAAAHAAAAAHA HHHHAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
CAMBRIGE ANALYTICA GETING THE TIMEOUT!!
10 days or 30 days for jiving the cool kids
I SEE YOU LURKING YOU SORRY DATA MINING FUCKS!! FUCK THE COOL KIDZ DATA ANYWAY
SUESHIOCOMETOPAPPSA!!!!!
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Oaksterdam Dan
^^^^tool
^^^^tool alert
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
These people have ties to
These people have ties to Cambridge Analytica:
The Mercers
Steve Bannon
Rudy Giuliani
Ted Cruz
Ben Carson
Tom Cotton
John Bolton
Thom Tillis
Kelly Anne Conway
Julian Assange
Hogan Gidley
David Bossie
Scott Brown
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Now it goes deeper.
Here's more...
Cambridge Analytica: links to Moscow oil firm and St Petersburg university
Data company gave briefing to Moscow firm Lukoil, and the lecturer who developed the crucial algorithm worked for St Petersburg university
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-academic-trawling...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: uncmozo
Thom: What did WE learn from
Thombot: What did WE learn from the NT Times today? Not Much...................
Speak for yourself you ignorant knucklehead. You've crossed the line, I really believe you're a Russian bot.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: smiley
lol, with everthing #45 is
lol, with everthing #45 is destroying, all Thommie can say is "but Hillary".
Will someone let this clown know that Clinton isnt in any office now?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Def. High
And neither is Obama.
And neither is Obama.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
the best people lol
the best people lol
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: An organ grinder’s tune
facebook stock down 5%
facebook stock down 5%
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: _
Did anyone quit facebook over
Did anyone here quit facebook over this?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Anthony
The Cambridge Analytics story
The Cambridge Analytics story is a nothing burger with regard to politics. It is a story with regard to Facebook users. It's akin to declaring "they couldn't have fooled me into voting for a Democrat, atheist, adulterous yankee without my mailing address and the knowledge that I like pizza." Also, Bernie Sanders is not and never has been a Democrat. Sympathies on his loss. I voted for him. He needs to try the Independent National Committee for cash, next time. DNC also gave zero dollars to Don Trump and Ted Cruz.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: thinthread
Haven't used Facebook in
Haven't used Facebook in almost a year
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
*Updated list*
*Updated list*
These people have ties to Cambridge Analytica:
The Mercers
Steve Bannon
Rudy Giuliani
Ted "Nothing Burger" Cruz
Ben Carson
Tom Cotton
John Bolton
Thom Tillis
Kelly Anne Conway
Julian Assange
Hogan Gidley
David Bossie
Scott Brown
*Erik Prince*
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
What is going to happen to
What is going to happen to that list of people?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Jared Kushner and Paul
Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort primary players in hiring Cambridge Analytica.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: smiley
<<<Did anyone here quit
my concern from the beginning has always been about our loss of privacy and i never even logged on.
im constantly blown away that people voluntarily give away to private corporations exactly the same thing they would fight tooth and nail against if "the government" came asking for it.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius
Oh my, this isn't going to
Oh my, this isn't going to help your narrative......
Ex-Obama Campaign Director Drops Bombshell Claim on Facebook: 'They Were on Our Side'
A former Obama campaign official is claiming that Facebook knowingly allowed them to mine massive amounts of Facebook data — more than they would’ve allowed someone else to do — because they were supportive of the campaign.
In a Sunday tweet thread, Carol Davidson, former director of integration and media analytics for Obama for America, said the 2012 campaign led Facebook to “suck out the whole social graph” and target potential voters. They would then use that data to do things like append their email lists.
“They came to office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side,” Davidson tweeted.
https://ijr.com/2018/03/1077083-ex-obama-campaign-director-fb/
It's interesting that no matter what the left accuses Trump of doing always ends up being something that Obama actually did.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: An organ grinder’s tune
dude.
dude.
he's not the fucking president any longer.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Old Fart Message Board
“Who’s running the show?”
“Who’s running the show?”
It’s the motherfuckers with all the money. Is it really that hard to figure out?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: El Nino
This is the only way change
This is the only way change will happen:
Shares of Facebook skidded 6.8%, their biggest one-day percentage decline since March 26, 2014, when it tumbled 6.9%, as the social-media giant has ignited a firestorm over third-parties’ access to Facebook users’ personal data.
I deactivated my account today. Let's see how long I can last.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ________
>It’s the motherfuckers with
>It’s the motherfuckers with all the money. Is it really that hard to figure out?
true
but I think the real hard part to figure out is that's the way the founders intended it
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Where Does The Time Go?
Thom wasn't interested in Roy
Thom wasn't interested in Roy Moore's activities:
Thom was interested in Al Franken's activities:
get it?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: ...
US Population - 325 million
US Population - 325 million US Facebook users - 215 million or 66% of US population
Cambridge Analytical captured info on 50 million of these accounts
or 23% of FB users or 15% of the US population. Not insignificant numbers
Channel 4's reports:
Whistleblower reveals data grab of 50 million Facebook profiles:
Cambridge Analytica Uncovered: Secret filming reveals election tricks:
Cambridge Analytica boss under fire from MPs:
It's interesting stuff, it's time to follow the $$
Also, I believe the British accents add an air of credibility to the reporting.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
The plan now seems quite
The plan now seems quite clear. Between Cambridge Analytica micro targeting 50 million people down to the precinct level. Bots spreading fake news. Russia targeting State Voter Registration Databases. They may have won this Election before the first vote was cast.
With the level of fine grain detail that Cambridge Analytica had on our voters down to the precinct level it would not surprise me if they were sharing their information with Russia while they were targeting our Voter Registration Databases.
- Mike Farb
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Oaksterdam Dan
who's data mining the ZONE???
who's data mining the ZONE for psychops??????