Immediately halt all investments in fossil fuel exploration and extraction.

Forums:


DAVOS, Switzerland — Greta Thunberg planned a speech to the world’s business and political leaders here Tuesday accusing them of “empty words and promises” that will do little to avert a climate change crisis.
“Our house is still on fire,” she was expected to say, reprising her most famous line from an address last year at the World Economic Forum, the annual gathering of the world’s rich and powerful in Davos, a village on the icy reaches of the Swiss Alps. “Your inaction is fueling the flames by the hour.”
Ms. Thunberg, 17, was scheduled to speak Tuesday afternoon at an event hosted by The New York Times and the World Economic Forum. Her planned remarks were made available to The Times in advance. Here is the full transcript:
One year ago I came to Davos and told you that our house is on fire. I said I wanted you to panic. I’ve been warned that telling people to panic about the climate crisis is a very dangerous thing to do. But don’t worry. It’s fine. Trust me, I’ve done this before and I assure you it doesn’t lead to anything.
And for the record, when we children tell you to panic we’re not telling you to go on like before.
We’re not telling you to rely on technologies that don’t even exist today at scale and that science says perhaps never will. We are not telling you to keep talking about reaching “net zero emissions” or “carbon neutrality” by cheating and fiddling around with numbers.
We are not telling you to “offset your emissions” by just paying someone else to plant trees in places like Africa while at the same time forests like the Amazon are being slaughtered at an infinitely higher rate.
Planting trees is good, of course, but it’s nowhere near enough of what needs to be done, and it cannot replace real mitigation or rewilding nature.
Let’s be clear. We don’t need a “low carbon economy.” We don’t need to “lower emissions.” Our emissions have to stop. And until we have the technologies that at scale can put our emissions to minus then we must forget about net zero — we need real zero.
Because distant net zero emission targets will mean absolutely nothing if we just continue to ignore the carbon dioxide budget — which applies for today, not distant future dates. If high emissions continue like now even for a few years, that remaining budget will soon be completely used up.
The fact that the U.S.A. is leaving the Paris accord seems to outrage and worry everyone, and it should.
But the fact that we’re all about to fail the commitments you signed up for in the Paris Agreement doesn’t seem to bother the people in power even the least.
Any plan or policy of yours that doesn’t include radical emission cuts at the source starting today is completely insufficient for meeting the 1.5-degree or well-below-2-degrees commitments of the Paris Agreement.
And again — this is not about right or left. We couldn’t care less about your party politics.
From a sustainability perspective, the right, the left as well as the center have all failed. No political ideology or economic structure has been able to tackle the climate and environmental emergency and create a cohesive and sustainable world. Because, in case you haven’t noticed, that world is currently on fire.
You say children shouldn’t worry. You say: “Just leave this to us. We will fix this, we promise we won’t let you down.”
And then — nothing. Silence. Or something worse than silence. Empty words and promises which give the impression that sufficient action is being taken.
All the solutions are obviously not available within today’s societies. Nor do we have the time to wait for new technological solutions to become available to start drastically reducing our emissions.
So of course the transition isn’t going to be easy. It will be hard. And unless we start facing this now together, with all cards on the table, we won’t be able to solve this in time.
In the days running up to the 50th anniversary of the World Economic Forum, I joined a group of climate activists who are demanding that you, the world’s most influential business and political leaders, begin to take the action needed.
We demand that at this year’s World Economic Forum participants from all companies, banks, institutions and governments:
Immediately halt all investments in fossil fuel exploration and extraction.
Immediately end all fossil fuel subsidies.
And immediately and completely divest from fossil fuels.
We don’t want these things done by 2050, 2030 or even 2021, we want this done now.
It may seem like we’re asking for a lot. And you will of course say that we are naïve. But this is just the very minimum amount of effort that is needed to start the rapid sustainable transition.
So either you do this or you’re going to have to explain to your children why you are giving up on the 1.5-degree target.
Giving up without even trying.
Well I’m here to tell you that unlike you, my generation will not give up without a fight.
The facts are clear, but they’re still too uncomfortable for you to address.
You just leave it because you think it’s too depressing and people will give up. But people will not give up. You’re the ones who are giving up.
Last week I met with coal miners in Poland who lost their jobs because their mine was closed. And even they had not given up. On the contrary, they seem to understand the fact that we need to change more than you do.
I wonder, what will you tell your children was the reason to fail and leave them facing the climate chaos you knowingly brought upon them? The 1.5-degree target? That it seemed so bad for the economy that we decided to resign the idea of securing future living conditions without even trying?
Our house is still on fire. Your inaction is fueling the flames by the hour. We are still telling you to panic, and to act as if you loved your children above all else

a 17yr old get is, yet you want to vote centrist in 2020, who will continue to take money from fossil fuel companies for further exploration and extraction. 

^ hey broken record, turn the fucking channel, yer gonna go insane keeping that shit up for 11 more months. Ya know, more insane than you already are. Shit bro, if you were a dog we would have to put you down

Yes lltd​

60429148-299D-4A7F-BEAE-D404F96A9FF2.jpeg...

hey ras, shut your fat mouth. 

see i can do it to. 

^ no need for some rachetheads to care in the least for future generations - they ain't reproducing. No way in hell they're finding someone of the opposite sex that would go anywhere's near em

Nice job pyramid, I'm always pulling for ya

you're a sad man today. you've been pretty good too, as of late. 

 

^ hahaaaa says the man who gets up spittin flames on anyone who even questions Bernie or his methods . Now take a minute, take a breath, a toke, a shit, have some coffee, another toke. There, feel better dontcha ?

Oh and fuck you for sneaking a post in between the one I posted for rachethead

that's what you have wrong -- bernie isn't some god to me, when he does wrong he's called out -- like issuing that apology, terrible move, and makes no sense. like i said, lacking that killer instinct. blows but it is what it is.

he can do wrong -- unlike you and your centrists gods, right. 

 

and yeah, i'm not some tapped out old guy. 

i'm ready to roll mother fucker. 

 

well at first you didn't have his name in there so i thought you were yelling at me. 

Its all good, lets keep it as such 

Yeah you better be ready to roll

 

 

 

Another Number

Tapped out old guy

"Does Bernie really make you that angry?"

Trump "we want the cleanest air, and that's what we have"

I guess "the air" now means tainted money 

endless shit show    Lying has merit

its a tough spot...on one hand, i see the need to stop using fossil fuels as quickly as possible.

on the other hand, i live off the grid, and without some kind of easily available liquid fuel, and power tools/machinery/generators that can accept said fuel, my entire life and everything ive ever wanted or worked for would be destroyed, id probably have to move back to my parents house. same goes for what id guess would be 95% of people living off grid.

its easy to think you can live on totally renewable energy when you live in a modern, densely populated city...but when you live 40min from a town that is basically two gas stations and a post office, to far out to even consider hooking up to the grid, its not nearly that simple.  \

Immediately halt all investments in fossil fuel exploration and extraction.

and mandate by law that money go into R&D for renewable fuels for both industrial/municipal use and individual/personal use, specifically biodiesel and other transportable energy sources. 

Immediately end all fossil fuel subsidies.

same as above

and perhaps some kind of regulation that forces companies profiting from the sales of gas/propane/fossil fuel powered technology to devote a certain percentage of profits, and a vast percentage of their entire R&D budgets into producing technology that can be powered on biodiesel or something similar. 

increasing battery tech is interesting also...i wonder if a high capacity battery with super fast charging could fit as much energy in a battery the size of a 5gal gas can, as 5 gallons would be able to provide when used in a standard gas generator or car.

the idea of relying totally on a government entity or corporation for all of the electricity that powers your entire life might seem totally normal to most, but it makes me very uneasy.

Nice post Daylight the word "all " must mean a vast majority

Keep living the dream and I do hope to see you at the show once or  twice a year

I agree battery technology advancements are needed, and expect major breakthroughs in 5 to 10 years