If it turns out proof exists that Trump has been severely "compromised" ...
Forums:
... for some time prior to the 2016 election.
Would it be fair for Dems to summarily impeach both Gorsuch and Kavanaugh; assuming they have the necessary supermajority in 2020 or sometime thereafter?
- Log in to post comments
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Def. High
It would be silly unless they
It would be silly unless they can prove high crimes and misdemeanors. Tough to prove against a SCOTUS member. What did they do wrong?
I'm afraid not liking their opinions is not sufficient.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Lassen
Maybe in a parallel universe,
Maybe in a parallel universe, sure.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: More Barn
Pray that RBG doesn't die
Pray that RBG doesn't die
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: 19.5 Degrees
It would be silly unless they
It would be silly unless they can prove high crimes and misdemeanors. Tough to prove against a SCOTUS member. What did they do wrong?
I'm afraid not liking their opinions is not sufficient<<<
It would have nothing to do with what either has "done" per se, but would stand as a repudiation of their nominations by a POTUS who may have had alterior motives related to said lifetime appointments; likewise, the remedy would provide an "insurance policy" to the American People that any questionable circumstances related to these Trump having been compromised would be immediately "cleansed".
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: 19.5 Degrees
Pray that RBG doesn't die<<<<
Pray that RBG doesn't die<<<<
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call"
Thoughts and prayers don't
Thoughts and prayers don't work.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: 19.5 Degrees
{{{{{{{ healing vibes to RGB
{{{{{{{ healing vibes to RGB }}}}}}
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ken D.
Yes, vibes and to RBG. She
Yes, vibes and to RBG. She is the only thing standing in the way of generations of judicial BS and she knows it.
Crazy thing is that if there is a vacancy at the Supreme Court during the upcoming election year, Mitch McConnell made clear they won't follow the policy they invoked back in 2016 to block Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland and would push through whichever American Taliban jurist Pence wants.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: 19.5 Degrees
Mitch McConnell made clear
Mitch McConnell made clear they won't follow the policy they invoked back in 2016 to block Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland<<<
He made his hypocrisy of the highest order abundantly clear.
I'm normally one to "take the high ground", but wouldn't be opposed to playing by a similar "all is fair in love and war" perspective; provided there's a genuine effort to "reset" the dial to a level playing field ... both for replacements and reform measures with respect to moving forward.