>>>>>This allows the DNC to hold depositions and subpoena documents of the ones named.
This is about the only practical benefit of the lawsuit, aside from forcing the named defendants to incur legal expenses. We will see if its survives a motion to dismiss. In the meantime, the DNC should be careful about throwing stones from glass houses considering how squeaky clean and above board their own campaign tactics were, especially when it came to the primaries.
A pathetic sign of desperation if ever there was one. And the ultimate in chutzpa to boot. Bring a lawsuit on a make believe topic of "collusion" that 18 months of Federal investigation hasn't found a scintilla of evidence to support and that only came to light because of opposition research that was paid for by, wait for it, the DNC and Hillary Clinton.
If you want evidence that the Mueller investigation is going nowhere this is all you need. And if anyone should be bringing a lawsuit for collusion in the 2016 campaign it should be Bernie Sanders suing the DNC.
Thom, when people from Trumps campaign start going to jail for their actions in the election are you going to just quit zoning or start over with a new name and pretend the last couple of years didn’t happen?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
The heat has been turned up
The heat has been turned up now.
Racketeering?
Rico??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-party-files-lawsuit-a...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Sorry for the cut off pics.
Sorry for the cut off pics.
Here's all 66 pages.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-dnc-sues-russia-trump-campaign-and-...
There are 10 John Doe's to be named later.
Oh, oh....
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: skifurthur
Racketeering?
This is a civil suit so neither of those things even come into play.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: skifurthur
I apologize for posting above
I apologize for posting above. It seems that some states do allow civil suits to contain RICO and Racketeering. My bad.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Tony - Yes it does.
Tony - Yes it does.
They're going for money. (Damages)
Not jail time.
This allows the DNC to hold depositions and subpoena documents of the ones named.
Which make their lives an even bigger hell.
They did this during Watergate and got $775,000 out of the 1 million they were seeking.
DNC received that ^^^ (quietly) the day Nixon left office.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ken D.
>>>>>This allows the DNC to
>>>>>This allows the DNC to hold depositions and subpoena documents of the ones named.
This is about the only practical benefit of the lawsuit, aside from forcing the named defendants to incur legal expenses. We will see if its survives a motion to dismiss. In the meantime, the DNC should be careful about throwing stones from glass houses considering how squeaky clean and above board their own campaign tactics were, especially when it came to the primaries.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Old Fart Message Board
DNC is so fucking broke it’s
DNC is so fucking broke it’s pitiful.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Not like the Mueller
Not like the Mueller investigations.
Subpoenas and depositions will be played out in public,
damaging anyone connected to Drumph, which means the whole RNC.
We'll be hearing about it everyday leading up to the elections.
Pretty smart move.
Only escaping it will be burying your head in the sand or watching FOX news.
Plead the 5th and you admit it. *fingers crossed*
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: St. Mark
Hillary lost the election
Hillary lost the election because of the patriarchy.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Richie Nagan
The ultimate in hypocrisy for
The ultimate in hypocrisy for the DNC to sue for being done to them what they did to Bernie.
Fuck the DNC.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
>>> Hillary lost the election
>>> Hillary lost the election because of
thepatriarchyPUTIN.Don't need a "high post" count here.
Shit stir somewhere else, this isn't about Hillary.
This about the crimes committed leading up to the election and damages that occurred because of it.
But you know that.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: thinthread
Fuck the dnc & gop.
Fuck the dnc & gop.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: gypsy tailwind
Fuck Tad Devine who's 1
Fuck Tad Devine who's 1 degree of separation from Paul Manafort.
Fake news right?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius
A pathetic sign of
A pathetic sign of desperation if ever there was one. And the ultimate in chutzpa to boot. Bring a lawsuit on a make believe topic of "collusion" that 18 months of Federal investigation hasn't found a scintilla of evidence to support and that only came to light because of opposition research that was paid for by, wait for it, the DNC and Hillary Clinton.
If you want evidence that the Mueller investigation is going nowhere this is all you need. And if anyone should be bringing a lawsuit for collusion in the 2016 campaign it should be Bernie Sanders suing the DNC.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Lucky Day
Thom, when people from Trumps
Thom, when people from Trumps campaign start going to jail for their actions in the election are you going to just quit zoning or start over with a new name and pretend the last couple of years didn’t happen?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: nebulous nelly
Thom will never stop
Thom will never stop defending his fellow bags of shit
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: St. Mark
>>>Shit stir somewhere else
>>>Shit stir somewhere else
Hush now, TOD. This is "somewhere else".
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: smiley
The dems arent going to like
The dems arent going to like the results if Trump pushes this Awan Brother thing.
Of course, Trump is fucked for his own misdeeds, but the Awans need to be investigated more seriously.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Thumbkinetic
Thom is a delusional and in
Thom is a delusional and in denial.
Poor Thom.