Bernie Bro reveals his inner totalitarian

Forums:

And not just any BB, but a Iowa Field Organizer.

No one who has studied the history of the radical left is surprised by any of this, it's just unusual for one of them to be so open about it.  At least before they seize thr reins of power.

 

“If Bernie doesn’t get the nomination or it goes to a second round at the DNC Convention, f*cking Milwaukee will burn. It’ll start in Milwaukee and when police push back on that, then other cities will just f*cking (hand explosion).”

“Well, I’ll tell you what in Cuba, what did they do to reactionaries? You want to fight against the revolution, you’re going to die for it, M*****F***er.”

“I’m ready to throw down now…The billionaire class. The f***ing media, pundits. Walk into MSNBC Studios, drag Those M*****F***ers out by their hair and light them on fire in the streets."

“Liberals Get the F***ing Wall First.”

“The cops are gonna be the ones that are getting f*cking beaten in Milwaukee. They’re gonna call up the National Guard for that sh*t. I promise you that.”

“Free Speech Has Repercussions…There Are Consequences for Your F***ing Actions…You Should Expect a Violent Reaction. And You Deserve a Violent Reaction.”

“Like F**k if We Can Beat Donald Trump, as Long as We Nominated a Woman. Like F***ing Idiot. Like What the F**k? The World is on Fire. This is an Emergency Situation, and You’re Hung Up on Vaginas.”

https://www.projectveritasaction.com/2020/01/14/expose2020-part-1-bernie...

I assume that Kyle Jurek is looking for a new job today, but hey maybe he'll get promoted.  After all, he also says that Stalin had it right and the gulags are a good idea.

Scratch a leftist, find a totalitarian.  Every Single Time.

Highly impressive journalism here. Especially coming from such an esteemed a shit rag propaganda hit job outlet such as veritas.

So if it's on video you think it's bad journalism?  Although I shouldn't be surprised that quoting someone accurately is no longer considered journalism by the left.

C'mon coward, you can do better than that.

Just admit that you're on board with the agenda.

Thread starter is disturbed, mindless, lost his shit and a coward

It is scary, sympathy, and god bless you Thom 

i am afraid / I ain't gonna read that above

 

At least he doesn't like GD tacky crap 

GTFO with your project veritas bullshit Thom. Fuck off. 
 

They're a right wing DISINFORMATION group. The head of it, James O'Keefe, is a notorious scumbag. 
 

You're a stupid fucking cunt Thom, get your anti-American bullshit out of here. Asshole. 
 

 

GTFO with your project veritas bullshit Thom. Fuck off. 
 

They're a right wing DISINFORMATION group. The head of it, James O'Keefe, is a notorious scumbag. 
 

You're a stupid fucking cunt Thom, get your anti-American bullshit out of here. Asshole. 
 

 

YEAH READ IT TWICE YOU POS 

Perhaps we should list all the crazies who worked on Trump’s campaign? We should probably start with the ones currently in prison.

Lol coward. Go back to the card catalog, sweatervest nazi fuck.

you know the right is closer to fascism, right? 

 

you are not qualified to give people research advice.

 

The OP employs a typical tactic you see Fox News use all the time.  Find some extreme left-wing nutty professor from some obscure liberal arts college who says far out things and present them as the face of modern academia. 

OK, I'm in a mood today and can't understand why anybody is even arguing about this particular subject. 

 

>  Find some extreme left-wing nutty professor from some obscure liberal arts college who says far out things and present them as the face of modern academia.<

 

Funny, to make folks on the right look ridiculous, racist,  bigoted,  just quote the President. 

I'm with Bucky but wanted to be somewhat civil and not swear and call the OP out like I was inclined to 

 

pray for lost souls 

and all of us because of the impact of and risk to world stability because of people like the OP

When we played frisbee all the time sweater vest with one of our instills for one of our buddies.  Had to smile

 

john skud You don't have to be so "polite" all the time

speak your real feelings. Sheesh

Wow where to start.

First off "Field Organizer" is someone who goes door to door in the winter in Iowa. The job qualification for that job is pretty much show up for work -  not fucked up to the point where you can't speak. Source was "Field Organizer" for three years. 

Second Veritas is known for editing and doctoring videos. I'm too lazy to look it up but there are many many examples. Where are you spending time online where you even come across such a thoroughly discredited source. That said this video is probably true.

WHICH IS WHY YOU SHOULD BE 100% BEHIND IMPEACHING TRUMP FOR ABUSING THE POWER OF THE PRESIDENCY BECAUSE SOME DAY THERE WILL BE A PERSON IN THAT OFFICE YOU DON'T AGREE WITH AND WE DON'T WANT THE STANDARD TO BE THE PRESIDENT GETS TO DO WHATEVER THE FUCK THEY WANT AS LONG AS THEIR PARTY SUPPORTS IT. 

 

So if it's on video you think it's bad journalism?  Although I shouldn't be surprised that quoting someone accurately is no longer considered journalism by the left.

because you are taking an accurate quote that obviously only represents the views of one person, or a small minority of people, and presenting it as if that quote is something universally agreed upon by all bernie supporters.

its the EXACT same thing as people saying that all trump supporters  are racists or white nationalists. literally the exact same thing.

Thom dropped his flaming bag of shit on the front porch of viva, rang the doorbell and sprinted away. I don't know why but that visual is cracking me up....

Hahahaha

What daylight said

deepfakes are still many years away from being undetectable. if you are good at finding the little, subtle tells in a professionally photoshopped image, those same tells are present in current deepfakes. 

the tech for creating someone's voice using AI is still not quite there yet...almost all deepfakes up on youtube atm make use of impressionists to do the voices.

people said alot of similar things when photoshop started getting scary good. "oh no, how will we know whats real anymore?"

somehow we got thru it, and it seems like no matter how good a photoshop job is, people who use the program professionally and at a very high level are able to find the little tells and signs an image has been altered, and its entirely possible the same will happen with deepfakes.

id also expect metadata to become a commonly discussed thing...these days most people are not even aware that within every digital photo there is metadata that includes details from the image...in some cases even the serial number of the camera and the gps location where the photo was taken. the serial number of the camera can be used to track you down if you bought the camera with a credit or debit card.

once deepfakes get really, truly good, id guess that most people will expect news media or government or whoever is presenting a video as news, to include access through a third party system to the video's metadata, which will be expanded significantly beyond the metadata available to us now, that will tell people if the video has been put through any kind of program capable of making deepfakes. this third party system for viewing metadata could be very easily secured and made to be totally impartial via blockchain.

it is possible, and will probably remain possible, to remove or edit metadata from an image or video, but im guessing videos with the metadata totally removed will be seen as totally unreliable to the point that it would be an embarrassment to even post a video with removed metadata as legit news, and a blockchain based third party app/system for viewing metadata could easily log any edits or suspicious activity .

sounds complicated, but for an end user it could be as easy as clicking a little icon in the corner of a video, a window with the metadata pops up where you will be able to see the basic info, what programs were used to edit it, and whether or not any changes have been made or may have been made to the metadata itself. 

Thom reveals his biases and  ignorance, once again. 

>> project veritas

 

You're a fucking dumpster fire, Thom. A walking, talking sham, and a blemish on the good name of librarians.

Not sure Metadata is going to be the answer as you can already extract and edit metadata down to the time code. Unless all video is going to go with encrypted Metadata that acts like DRM but that is not the case now. 

At the end of the day Veritas puts out obviously edited videos and they still get mileage from that. It comes down to the old LBJ story: 

“Christ, we can’t get a way calling him a pig-fucker,” the campaign manager protested.  “Nobody’s going to believe a thing like that.”

“I know,” Johnson replied.  “But let’s make the sonofabitch deny it.

 

 

 

i think they are closer than you think to becoming undetectable. i really like your metadata validation idea, you should make it a company.....

plus people seemingly have lost the ability to critically think for themselves....i don't think they will really take the time to analyze the video content, hell they don't even scrutinize the words or fact check shit.

Lol turtle so true. 

I’ll be honest I didn’t even click on the pile of shit, I just went straight to attacking the source.

Thom gets lit up on his absurd posts then... crickets..


Meta data at the time would've made a difference whether Leeann Tweeden would've got her book deal (payment) or not.

 

Imagine if Al franken were here now?

 

 

>>>Imagine if Al franken were here now?

There would be no ATM fees?


There's always ATM fees, you know this right?