50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions

Forums:

If the environmental movement want to know wht so many people are skeptical of their apocalyptic claims, read on.

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

Links to and images of all of the articles and reports are included.

 

1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975

1969: ‘Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989.’

1970: Ice age by 2000

1970: ‘America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.’

1971: ‘New Ice Age Coming’

1972: New ice age by 2070

1974: ‘New Ice Age Coming Fast’

1974: ‘Another Ice Age?’

1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’

1976: ‘The Cooling’

1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’

1988: James Hansen forecasts increase regional drought in 1990s

1988: Washington DC days over 90F to from 35 to 85

1988: Maldives completely under water in 30 years

1989: Rising seas to ‘obliterate’ nations by 2000

1989: New York City’s West Side Highway underwater by 2019

1995 to Present: Climate Model Failure

2000: ‘Children won’t know what snow is.’

2002: Famine in 10 years

2004: Britain to have Siberian climate by 2020

2008: Arctic will be ice-free by 2018

2008: Al Gore warns of ice-free Arctic by 2013

2009: Prince Charles says only 8 years to save the planet

2009: UK prime minister says 50 days to ‘save the planet from catastrophe’

2013: Arctic ice-free by 2015

2013: Arctic ice-free by 2016

2014: Only 500 days before ‘climate chaos’

 

This is not a track record that encourages me to let the alarmists give control of these issues to government hacks.

 

 

*rolls eyes*

Shoulda known

*clicks back button*

I'm not a scientist, but have you been to the beach lately. High tides are flooding low lying areas up and down the coast. Now if you don't believe the ice is melting, then the alternative is the shore is sinking. I'm staying put in upstate N.Y. and if I live long enuf, I'll have beach front property. That's a joke, it my home is under water, it's the end.

Well, I'm personally glad that these worst case predictions haven't happened - yet.

On an anecdotal level, I remember visiting relatives in LA in the '70's and my eyes started stinging and I quickly developed a horrible cough.

I'd like to think that employing "alarmist" laws, like mandatory catalytic converters and regular smog checks have helped to make the air cleaner - seems that way to me, though I know that the smog still returns regularly.

https://timeline.com/la-smog-pollution-4ca4bc0cc95d

The Competitive Enterprise Institute is a corporate lobby shell.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competitive_Enterprise_Institute

CEI promotes environmental policies based on limited government regulation and property rights and rejects what they call "global warming alarmism".[3] The organization's largest program, the Center for Energy and Environment, focuses on energy policy, chemical risk policy, Clean Air Act regulation, land and water regulation, the Endangered Species Act, and private conservation policies.

CEI is an outspoken opponent of government action by the Environmental Protection Agency that would require limits on greenhouse gas emissions. It favors free-market environmentalism, and supports the idea that market institutions are more effective in protecting the environment than is government. CEI President Kent Lassman wrote on the organization's blog that, "there is no debate about whether the Earth’s climate is warming", that "human activities very likely contribute to that warming", and that "this has long been the CEI's position".[4]

In March 1992, CEI's founder Fred Smith said of anthropogenic climate change: "Most of the indications right now are it looks pretty good. Warmer winters, warmer nights, no effects during the day because of clouding, sounds to me like we're moving to a more benign planet, more rain, richer, easier productivity to agriculture."[5]

In May 2006, CEI's global warming policy activities attracted attention as it embarked upon an ad campaign with two television commercials.[6] These ads promote carbon dioxide as a positive factor in the environment and argue that global warming is not a concern. One ad focuses on the message that CO2 is misrepresented as a pollutant, stating that "it's essential to life. We breathe it out. Plants breathe it in... They call it pollution. We call it life."[7] The other states that the world's glaciers are "growing, not melting... getting thicker, not thinner."[7] It cites Science articles to support its claims. However, the editor of Science stated that the ad "misrepresents the conclusions of the two cited Science papers... by selective referencing". The author of the articles, Curt Davis, director of the Center for Geospatial Intelligence at the University of Missouri, said CEI was misrepresenting his previous research to inflate their claims. "These television ads are a deliberate effort to confuse and mislead the public about the global warming debate," Davis said.[8]

In 2009, CEI's director of energy and global warming policy told The Washington Post, "The only thing that's been demonstrated to reduce emissions is economic collapse".[9]

In 2014, CEI sued the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy over a video that linked the polar vortex to climate change.[10]

------------------------

Don't take offense in this Thom but you come across like the type of guy who huffs paint in his master closet with women's panty hose pulled over his head.

Brother thom, how old ye be ?  Cuz you're that many years of failed arguments.

Did you ever win one in like kindergarten or first grade ? I can't see it.

 

He’s like a busted ass Timex “Takes a licking and keeps on ticking”, barely

Go eat a bag of DDT.

Apparently some of you are skeptical of my skepticism.  And perhaps you're feeling guilty about how you've treated Gaia.

I have a solution for you.

Confess your sins to a plant.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/absolute-theological-bankruptcy-...

You'll feel better for it and you can thank me later.

Catdaddy, wake up, please.

^That's almost as crazy as doing drugs and attending a music concert. 

 

Dayum... 

Lol    ?

 So fucking predictable it’s sad

I wonder if you take a shit and it was blue, would you kill yourself??

You are probably a very literate person or take pride in beings so, and I am not

Was is it don Quixote that tilted against Windmills?

Why do ostriches stick their head in the sand —is it to get to the other side?

 

Just wow 

Do you hate California also

 Are you resentful of California and perhaps even childishly spiteful?

Poor don don.  Complete tool

 Thom do u think u have s higher IQ or emotional maturity than your leader?

"Anti Science Movement Hurts America"

<<But in fact, science is messy. It starts with a hypothesis, a theory about the way something works. One scientist finds evidence that seems to prove or disprove that idea. Others pile on, testing it, modifying it, and sometimes disproving it. 

People see news of these debates and think, "Aha, those scientists don't really know what they're talking about." So they feel free to choose whichever scientific facts they want to believe in and cluster into social groups based on those beliefs.>>

https://www.businessinsider.com/anti-science-movement-hurts-america-2015-3

Victory at all costs

 

sates rights?   Only if they are red

A bunch of fucking hypocrites

have a “nice” day

Poor Thom can't help himself.

So Harvard has this really inventive and creative way to combat the effects of rising global temperatures. Spraying the sky with particulates to reflect harmful uv radiation and effectively cool the planet.

Chemtrails might be the new Climate Justice Warriors!!! 

The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice

https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/publications/potential-cl...

 

 

>>>>2014: Only 500 days before ‘climate chaos’

One just needs to look around and its clear we are already in a period of climate chaos.  "100 year floods" are occurring yearly, hurricanes are getting stronger and more frequent, glaciers are melting, wildfires are out of control, etc.

Talk to the residents of Paradise, California or Abaco Island in the Bahamas if you still have doubts as to whether things are "normal."   According to NOAA, the five hottest years on record (since they started keeping records in the late 1800s) have been the last five years.   Shit, I was just up in Arctic Circle and it was hot and smokey from unprecedented wildfires.  Brooks Range is only a few miles off in the distance in this picture:

Brooks Range.jpg

There are two types of "climate skeptics."   First, you have people who recognize the obvious and understand the place is getting hotter and hotter, but dismiss it as part of natural climatic cycles that have been going on since the dawn of time.   However, what they miss is the speed in which the weather is changing and how it can't be attributed to some dramatic event such as an astroid strike or mega-volcano eruption (both of which would cause a dramatic cooling).

Then you have folks that refuse to acknowledge the obvious and simply ignore science and don't believe the weatherman.   But as they say, you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.

Jeff Bezos , before he cures climate change, can he take a few minutes and fix that buffering on the Firestik?

https://apple.news/AH4lgbjL2Sk-6irKHCzo9xg

 

for the birds 

just a left wing hoax......

Apparently some of you feel a need to repent.  I'm here to help.

 

Even those who care deeply about the planet's future can slip up now and then. Tell us: Where do you fall short in preventing climate change? Do you blast the A/C? Throw out half your lunch? Grill a steak every week? Share your anonymous confession with NBC News.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/specials/climate-confessions-share-solution...

 

Go ahead.  You know you want to.  Confess your sins and repent.

 

And unfortunately, some of you are going to not reproduce and carry on the fight.

"​I PLEDGE NOT TO HAVE CHILDREN UNTIL I AM SURE MY GOVERNMENT WILL ENSURE A SAFE FUTURE FOR THEM"

http://www.nofuturepledge.ca/

Because some people actually believe that this is something that government can, and should, do.

Paul Erlich didn't take the pledge.  But then, he got a lot of things wrong.

Activism as social currency, the sign of our times.

Have you tried the BK impossible whopper?

This is lunatic straw man bullshit.

Oh, it's Thom.

 

ok. carry on.

Personally, I have reproduced five times 

does that make me evil and a traitor to the cause?

 

or ......

I repent 

Not sure what for .,.

 

having a conscience 

or a heart

or a brain

or replying to a f—-

Vasectomies were all the rage in Earth First! circles for population control and I know plenty of people who have successfully avoided adding more people to the planet.   I have one kid and don't plan on anymore, so I guess I am ok on that front Chinese style. 

>>>Have you tried the BK impossible whopper?

I have to travel up and down the I-5 corridor for work and the couple of BKs right off the highway (Castle Rock and Woodburn) have been a guilty convenience.  They have had regular veggie burgers for sometime, but the Impossible Whopper is definitely an upgrade.  Got one recently coming back from a hearing in Marion County and way cheaper than the Impossible Burgers at local brewpubs. 

Sticking to a plant based diet (except for front yard chicken eggs and game and fish I catch myself) is one way of helping to offset my carbon footprint caused by all the plane travel I do.

Thom = Foxnews = Unable To Learn = Box Of Rocks

I hope that you folks are willing to give up your computers to save the environment....

"much of the electricity that powers the cloud is generated by burning fossil fuels. As a result, machine learning has a large carbon footprint. ...  training a model for natural-language processing – the field that helps “virtual assistants” like Alexa understand what you’re saying – can emit as much as 626,155lb of carbon dioxide. That’s about the same amount produced by flying roundtrip between New York and Beijing 125 times. ...

To decarbonize, we need to decomputerize.

This proposal will no doubt be met with charges of Luddism. Good: Luddism is a label to embrace. The Luddites were heroic figures and acute technological thinkers. ... Luddism urges us to consider: progress towards what and progress for whom? Sometimes a technology shouldn’t exist. Sometimes the best thing to do with a machine is to break it."

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/17/tech-climate-change-l...

I wonder just who gets to decide just which technologies shouldn't exist.  I'm sure it will be someone smarter that myself, perhaps John Kerry.....

“We just can’t sit on our asses and leave the political process to neanderthals who don’t want to believe in the future”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/03/john-kerry-says-we-c...

Believe in the future, or John Kerry's vision of it?  He really needs to be more careful about exposing the agenda of the ruling class.

They're better than you, and you need to let them run your life.  For yor own good of course.

On the issue of fossil fuels powering the cloud, many tech giants have been building enormous server farms out in the sticks in eastern Oregon to take advantage of the abundance of cheap electricity produced by the hydroelectric dams on the Columbia River.  They have their own issues with salmon, but it is otherwise clean and renewable.

One of the many energy solutions is decentralization (which would be great for small biz).  In other words, get everyone off the grid as much as possible...  be it solar, wind, cogeneration, digesters for septic, tidal, river, etc.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqPKJ1c-w_Q