The 2017 Preakness

Top of Page Bottom of Page By
Full Name: 
he who was Crabneesh
crabneesh on Saturday, May 20, 2017 – 02:23 am

Forums:

I will not bet because I don't like the payouts. If I did bet it would be a superfecta as follows: the 4 or 5 or 9 to win; the 2,3,4,5,6,9. or 10 to place; the 2,3,4,5,6, 9, or 10 to show; & the 2,3,4,5,6,9, or 10 in 4th position. $1 bet = $360. If it wins it probably will not pay over $500.

Top of Page Bottom of Page

Full Name: 
treat island
judit on Saturday, May 20, 2017 – 02:50 am

Hi Crabneesh. I won't bet either, but I would only bet if I could accurately predict the future. I can't.

 

Top of Page Bottom of Page

Full Name: 
_________
Plf9905 on Saturday, May 20, 2017 – 06:35 pm

Classic Empire for The WIN that is my call.

Top of Page Bottom of Page

Full Name: 
_________
Plf9905 on Saturday, May 20, 2017 – 06:54 pm

CLOUD COMPUTING For The Win ! GNARLY !

Top of Page Bottom of Page

Full Name: 
he who was Crabneesh
crabneesh on Saturday, May 20, 2017 – 07:08 pm

Good thing I didn't go to the track. 2,5,8,9. What an upset. Superfecta paid $8,162.80.

Top of Page Bottom of Page

Full Name: 
Zzzzzz
Zang on Monday, May 22, 2017 – 08:15 am

Great fucking race.    Dreaming just crashed and burned.    

Not sure how I feel about these horses staggering their races so they have a better chance to win.    What American Pharaoh did was impressive in 2015.   They are already talking about Cloud Computing not running in the Belmont.    So skips Derby, Wins Preakness and may skip Belmont because presumably if the horse fails it knocks down potential future mating fees.  

Not sure if I'd want them to require horses to run all three races or not (obviously field size would be one issue) but it seems like it determine the strongest horse better.