Salem Police v. Proud Boys

Forums:

2021 is starting off to an interesting twist.   Pitched street fights today between the Salem Police and the Proud Boys.   Those fools have been making a nuisance of themselves down in Salem, trying to break into the Capitol Building to stop the legislature from enacting new Covid related laws.

Ironic to see these guys (who are usually protected by the Portland cops) getting tear gassed and screaming "Fuck the Blue"

https://twitter.com/EricAJournalist/status/1345197037210353664?s=20

 

Delicious!

 

can only hope the Proud Boys get pummeled next week when they attempt to storm Congress.
Could all lead to some significant new gun control legislation if they start shooting  at cops and lawmakers. 

Get out of town BOYS

Gonna chase those crazy baldheads out of town

2021 looking great so far!

Nice to see the cops take action. These selfish idiots can't make up their minds who's on their side. Kinda like "the occupant." 

Maybe I'll make acquaintance with a few at the Utah State Capitol protest on the 6th. My signs will be a bit different than theirs. F 'em. 

I'm taking off work to go support the democracy our veterans fought and died for. Stop The Steal? How about Stop The Lies. We DID make America great again.  

 

Bugaloo_2.jpg

If god will protect you from coronavirus

what do you need the guns for?

The guns are to shoot antagonists that confront them. Let the cops do that. 

You mean this, BSS?  Got this from here, I think. 

Mask Rifle_0.jpg

Thinking 'bout some sign content. This should make some folks happy. Might mention the 80 judges callin' BS on another with "Trump scams his sheep for millions". There's options.

1-6-21 Protest_page_01 (495x640).jpg

Anger, the anger is palpable

After having his case tossed last night by a judge, that dickhead Gohmert went on TV last night.....

From HuffPo - 

The Texas lawmaker said on Newsmax — a far-right news network that routinely peddles baseless conspiracy theories that favor Trump — that the judge’s ruling would only leave violence as a recourse.

“Bottom line is, the court is saying, ‘We’re not going to touch this, you have no remedy,’” Gohmert said. “Basically, in effect, the ruling would be that you got to go to the streets and be as violent as antifa and BLM [Black Lives Matter].”

A753B73B-285F-457C-86AF-66D93BCADD62.png
 

Taking it to the streets!

Feds of different stripes.  Still a bunch of feds.

My fuckin' tax money pays for all this stupid shit.

proud boys don't like proud girls....

Oh wait, what I meant to say was be like Dr. King! 

Gohmert (800x365).jpg

(off topic, but had to share somewhere, LOL)

135190306_3292201440907119_6784542991596048692_n.jpg

WTF, TX?

imagine thinking bc biden won, america is now great again. your sign sucks, slick. 

and is everything that's wrong w/ establishment corporate politics. 

sad. 

There's an axiom I'll use here for your comment, heat. "Consider the source, disregard the statement." Like I ignored your last stupid comment to me in another thread.

What's sad is that obviously you have no f'ing sense of humor if you're going to THAT that comment so literally. Geez you're an idiot, and such a dour one at that.

HAPPY New Year to you... and the respected Senator Bernie Sanders. You did get the word "corporate" in there, but didn't use "neo". Surprised. Get to work and quit bitching without action. Bye, Felicia. 

1. Refuting the central point (directly addresses and refutes the central point)

2. Refutation (finds the mistake and explains the mistake using quotes)

3. Counterargument (contradicts and then backs it up with reasoning or supporting evidence)

4. Contradiction (states the opposing case with little to no supporting evidence)

5. Responding to tone (criticizes the tone of the writing without addressing the substance of the argument)

6. Ad hominem (attacks the writer's authority without addressing the substance of the issue at hand)

7. Name calling (you are a communist, heathen, republican, touch head, etc,)

 

20210103_143124.jpg