Let Tulsi Debate

Counterpoint: time for Tulski to go back to serving her constituents of Hawaii and Moscow and leave the debates to the two remaining serious candidates. No need for Lyndon Larouche circa 2020 to be involved anymore. 

as much as i love tulsi and would love to see her on the debate stage, she needs to drop out. i want to see more tulsi in the coming years and decades and i dont get what her angle is on staying in the race...this does not seem like the best path forward to ensure we see more tulsi over the coming years.

https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-declines-join-december-democratic-debate-regardless-qualification-1476347

"For a number of reasons, I have decided not to attend the December 19th 'debate' — regardless of whether or not there are qualifying polls. I instead choose to spend that precious time directly meeting with and hearing from the people of New Hampshire and South Carolina," Gabbard wrote.

please post a single piece of evidence tulsi has anything to do with russia

but you wont, cause there is none

^^^ right there 

TY Ken

"because hillary said it" is not valid evidence

Apparently that's not valid evidence Ken. Figured you of all people might know that. 

.

I found this. Here she is pictured with Putin and Assad. 

Fuck Tulsi. Representative Present. 

according to the literal definition of evidence, its not. i dont need to know anything about politics to know hillarys statement is not evidence, i just need a dictionary

I'd like to see Tulsi next to one of those Popeye's Chicken Sandwiches.

>>>>a single piece of evidence tulsi has anything to do with russia

https://www.rt.com/usa/480080-tulsi-gabbard-caucus-abused-iowa/

https://www.rt.com/usa/478991-gabbard-lawsuit-clinton-elite-russia/

https://www.rt.com/usa/476241-tulsi-votes-present-impeachment/

https://www.rt.com/usa/475555-gabbard-afghanistan-lies-inquiry/

https://www.rt.com/news/473978-putin-favorite-democrat-candidates/

https://www.rt.com/usa/469548-tulsi-trump-challengers-impeachment/

https://www.rt.com/usa/465093-tulsi-sues-google-ads-blocked/

https://www.rt.com/usa/462836-tulsi-ryan-911-democrats-debate/

https://www.rt.com/usa/459749-tulsi-gabbard-russia-interview/

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/460231-tulsi-gabbard-on-online-russian-support-they-agree-its-better-when-were-not

I get it that some people want a president who is fuckable, it's just not going to happen in 2020. 

http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/ID/20879/Tulsi-Gabbard-Hires-Russian-Agent-to-Keep-Hawaii-Media-in-Check.aspx

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-10-25/tulsi-gabbard-russian-asset-republican

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election/tulsi-gabbard-russia-david-duke-policies-2020-campaign-white-nationalist-hawaii-propaganda-a8768056.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russian-web-trolls-boo-biden-often-boost-gabbard-report-finds-n1085216

https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-being-used-russians-former-us-double-agent-evidence-clear-opinion-1466750

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/03/03/gabb-m03.html

https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/485051-tulsi-gabbard-presidential-candidates-must-also-condemn-election

have you seen joe biden bucky? he's losing his mind. i could slip in and out of him and he'd never even remember. how much more fuckable of a president could you ask for?

90% of those articles are just reporting things that tusli has done, many of them good - asking congress to investigate afghanistan, awesome. asking US intelligence to stay out of elections - fucking badass.

i enjoy abby martin and a few other folks who have spent time on RT so just posting RT links as some kind of implication means very little to me.

"russian bots" have been boosting and deriding all kinds of candidates - tulsi is no more a russian asset than bernie. the focus is division, not supporting a specific candidate.

I meant fuckable in the "attractive" sense, not in the "easy to sexually assault due to dementia" sense

but I get your point 

>>>i enjoy abby martin and a few other folks who have spent time on RT

what's "RT"?

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/sanders-rejects-russia-support-956687/

What is Tulsi's repsonse to learning that the Russians are again interfering in the election?

She wrote this: https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/485051-tulsi-gabbard-presidential-candidates-must-also-condemn-election

Reckless claims by anonymous intelligence officials that Russia is “helping” Sen. Bernie Sanders are deeply irresponsible. So was former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's calculated decision Tuesday to repeat this unsubstantiated accusation on the debate stage in South Carolina. Enough is enough. I am calling on all presidential candidates to stop playing these dangerous political games and immediately condemn any interference in our elections by out-of-control intelligence agencies.

A “news article” published last week in The Washington Post, which set off yet another manufactured media firestorm, alleges that the goal of Russia is to trick people into criticizing establishment Democrats. This is a laughably obvious ploy to stifle legitimate criticism and cast aspersions on Americans who are rightly skeptical of the powerful forces exerting control over the primary election process. We are told the aim of Russia is to “sow division,” but the aim of corporate media and self-serving politicians pushing this narrative is clearly to sow division of their own — by generating baseless suspicion against the Sanders campaign.

It’s extremely disingenuous for “journalists” and rival candidates to publicize a news article that merely asserts, without presenting any evidence, that Russia is “helping” Bernie Sanders — but provides no information as to what that “help” allegedly consists of.

The American people have the right to know this information in order to put Russia’s alleged “interference” into proper perspective. It is a mystery why the Intelligence Community would want to hide these details from us. Instead it is relying on highly dubious and vague insinuations filtered through its preferred media outlets, which seem designed to create a panic rather than actually inform the public about a genuine threat.

All this does is undermine voters’ trust in our elections, which is what we are constantly told is the goal of Russia.

If the CIA, FBI or any other intelligence agency is going to tell voters that “Russians” are interfering in this election to help certain candidates — or simply “sow discord” — then it needs to immediately provide us with the details of what exactly it's alleging. Otherwise, all it is doing is fomenting a sense of powerlessness and paranoia in the voting public, which could suppress engagement in the electoral process. And, at least according to the anonymous officials speaking menacingly to the media, that is precisely what Russia wants.

...

It is now clear that the mainstream corporate media and the warmongering political establishment are seeking to do two things:

Create enough suspicion around Sanders, by falsely tarnishing him as a puppet of Russia, that he loses the election.

Or, at the very least, if Bernie wins the Democratic nomination, force him to engage in inflammatory anti-Russia rhetoric and perpetuate the new Cold War and nuclear arms race, which are existential threats to our country and the world.

That strategy worked very well with President Trump.  Trump has spent his entire presidency trying to "prove" to the media that he is not Putin’s puppet by carrying out extremely aggressive policies that have brought us closer to nuclear war with Russia than we have been in decades.

If Sanders is the Democratic nominee, the corporate media will do everything they can to turn the general election into a contest of who is going to be "tougher" on Russia. This tactic is necessary to propagandize the American people into shelling over their hard-earned tax dollars to the Pentagon to fund the highly lucrative nuclear arms race that the military-industrial complex craves. In the most recent appropriations bill last year, the Pentagon was handed $738 billion — which includes a blank check for dangerous new nuclear warheads and destabilizing missile systems that increase the likelihood of catastrophic war with Russia.

...

The problem with Trump is that he talks tough against the media and the intelligence agencies, but he was not strong enough to stand up to their pressure. He was cowed into trying to prove that he’s not a puppet of Russia and as a consequence has brought us closer and closer to nuclear war. The Democratic nominee cannot make the same mistake; our country and the world are depending on it."

At least, it would be nice to see a beautiful woman next two two old geezers on stage.

holy shit did prince come back from the grave to post that 

Maybe Vanna White is available, timpy.

sorry, Bucky, seemed appropriate to use "pinko" and "red menace" colors.

To summarize that colorful mess:

1) Sanders is told Russia is interfering.

2) Sanders agrees, condemns it, and blames Russians for the toxic "Bernie bro" stuff.

3) Tulsi calls it all lies by warmongerers in the Deep State who are mean to Russia and WE COULD ALL DIE if we aren't nicer to the poor Russians, who have thousands  of nukes pointed at us and we COULD ALL DIE.

>> 2) Sanders agrees, condemns it, and blames Russians for the toxic "Bernie bro" stuff. <<

p-heater prefers cheap vodka.

Tulsi isn't afraid to wear white before Memorial Day.

she can always go on Fox news - they love her 

>>>>Russia Today - Its Putins's news channel.

i'm going to need to know their privacy and cookies policy before I click on that 

     Aside from being foul-mouthed & belligerent, I'm sure Bucky has redeemable qualities...understanding the nature of the Russia scam is not one of them, he will ultimately believe whatever spoon-fed narrative is offered up by Rachael Maddow and Jake Tapper, along with huge swaths of the electorate, it's regrettable.

Tulsi - Paid Stooge

>>>>Aside from being foul-mouthed & belligerent, I'm sure Bucky has redeemable qualities..

well thanks Bryen I've got to say I don't feel you would have any redeemable qualities 

     ^ brilliant as always, enjoy the day Bucky...if there were an easily approachable truth I would point you towards, it would be the meeting in the Oval Office on January 5th, 2017

At least she is better looking than those 2 old white guys.

She has always been the hottest Democratic candidate by far. 

     She's certainly attractive, although she's married...she is a noninterventionist, which is indeed very attractive!

     https://youtu.be/LeHzzH5zXSI

                                                                             What The World Needs Now

                                                                             Burt Bacharach

                                                                             https://youtu.be/lSBrn6wTZSA

Don't forget Bryen I'm not here to debate you or to click on your links, I'm just here to remind you that you're an asshole. 
 

Hey Bryen, you're an asshole. 

     Miguel Ángel Jiménez Golf Academy 

     https://youtu.be/K8_U0j-TYgM

                                                                                                https://youtu.be/7LNqmENS0jw

     ^ I have to apologize to Bucky, in hindsight that seems juvenile, the goal should be to have unconditional love in my heart for everyone...unconditionally.

     I apologize.

     Respect 

     Gregorian Chant Abbey of Clervaux
     https://youtu.be/ImGMU63fRXo

Vanna White>>>
 

I might not be old enough to know who that is, Ned.

     Burt Bacharach  

     Canada  

     1977

     https://youtu.be/9vAHEvDf5Ok

El Nino nailed it.

(So did Bucky)