its fine honestly, anyone who lives in or near sf knows to avoid market st anyway, the lanes were confusing as fuck, pedestrians take fucking forever to cross, its a mess. probably better this way. that whole area, from embarcadero up to the loin and across to van ness is much better traversed on foot anyway. i havent driven on market street in probably almost 10 years.
i think the ban is just a major section of market near either union square or embarcadero, not even the whole thing. streets north and south of market are set up like a grid, just slightly offset from each other, with streets south of market running diagonally and streets north of market running straight north/south, so there are major streets just a block or two away that run in the same direction and will take you to the same places. might cause extra congestion in rush hour, since the streets that run parallel to market have less lanes, but outside of rush hour i cant see this having much more impact than just confusing tourists.
It's from 10th street to the Ferry Building, and the cross-streets are still open.
I was worried it was going to extend further, since I use the Octavia exit to Market to Franklin to get to the SFJazz venue and other places, but I can still use Market for that.
Cabs can still use it but not Uber/Lyft cars, and I guess they're going to add more buses & trolly's. Still, I'm not really sure what the true point of it is, since as others have said not many people use that stretch of Market to drive.
I guess maybe it's just another way for San Francisco to "make a point."
the needles and poop trope is pretty overblown, but there are a few areas where that kinda stuff does happen. a good section of the mission and the tenderloin do live up to the hype, but thats like 10% of the city...the rest of the city is really nice, super clean, etc.
the needle issue is actually due to an error made in the administration of needle exchange programs, where instead of being a needle exchange, they are just giving them out willy nilly. a nice example of classic SF over liberalizing, it seems like some city officials thought that by not requiring dirty needles to be exchanged for clean needles, they would be able to reduce the spread of blood borne disease even further by reducing a barrier to obtaining clean needles - having to keep and turn in your dirty rigs.
and they are probably right - there are probably more junkies using city provided clean needles than there would be if the city required a true exchange to obtain needles.
and as anyone with experience with junk could tell you, the junkies nodding on the corner now have an unlimited supply of needles and no incentive to clean up after themselves.
it would be easy to look at the situation and revert to standard conservative thinking, that to get rid of the needles the city needs to stop giving them out, needle exchange experiment failed.
id recommend they look at some of the nordic countries like sweden that have centers where drug users can take their drugs and inject them using a clean rig under the supervision of nurses/medical professionals, with narcan on hand. in the areas where these programs are in place, the numbers on overdose deaths have dropped more than just about any other tactic used to cure opiate OD's the world over.
you still get to curb the spread of blood borne disease by giving people free needles, you drastically reduce overdose deaths, and the needles never see the street because they do not leave the facility.
the poop thing tho, idk man. theres no easy answer and in those small areas like part of the mission and the loin, the poop trope is very real. id guess a large percentage of it is due to very favorable weather for homeless people combined with the city's insistence on people not doing drugs in restrooms, so they just dont install public restrooms. because poop on the streets is fine but god forbid someone whose life is utterly and irrevocably destroyed find some solace in a shot of tar on the floor of a portapoty.
so you'd rather they do it openly on the street? and then shit in the gutters?
offering designated areas for drug injection could allow for the placement of more public restrooms in problem areas without the need for as much management and maintenence. at the same time tho i think they should just let people do drugs in the bathrooms.
as an adult its easy to find a restroom but when i was a teenager out in SF, no business would allow us to use the restroom without buying something, so i ended up pissing all over the streets - alleys, flower beds, the BART tracks, whatever. it used to blow my mind that people would always complain SF smells like piss, but its impossible for someone who does not look like a respectable adult or have extra money to find a place to pee.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Rasputin O'Leary Rasmataz
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 08:28 am
You mean to tell me calif
You mean to tell me calif hasn't banned all cars yet ? WT hell, the rest of the nation looks to you for guidance.
What's that Elon Musk up to out there anyway ?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Racketinmyhead Racketinmyhead
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 08:46 am
Sweet, more tent space for
Sweet, more tent space for the homeless meth fiends,
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Dr. Benway daylight
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 11:23 am
its fine honestly, anyone who
its fine honestly, anyone who lives in or near sf knows to avoid market st anyway, the lanes were confusing as fuck, pedestrians take fucking forever to cross, its a mess. probably better this way. that whole area, from embarcadero up to the loin and across to van ness is much better traversed on foot anyway. i havent driven on market street in probably almost 10 years.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius Thom2
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 11:37 am
Is the ban just on going up
Is the ban just on going up and down Market? I assume that you can still go across Market on a side street?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Dr. Benway daylight
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 11:42 am
i think the ban is just a
i think the ban is just a major section of market near either union square or embarcadero, not even the whole thing. streets north and south of market are set up like a grid, just slightly offset from each other, with streets south of market running diagonally and streets north of market running straight north/south, so there are major streets just a block or two away that run in the same direction and will take you to the same places. might cause extra congestion in rush hour, since the streets that run parallel to market have less lanes, but outside of rush hour i cant see this having much more impact than just confusing tourists.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: El Nino kxela
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 11:42 am
The only people who drove
The only people who drove down Market in the last 15 years were lost tourists.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Lord Kalvert Lloyd_Klondike
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 12:03 pm
still can't drive in GG Park
still can't drive in GG Park on the weekends -- neener neener
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Johnny D skudebro
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 12:59 pm
^That's a good thing
^That's a good thing
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Lance minimum goad Newberry heathentom
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 01:30 pm
It's from 10th street to the
It's from 10th street to the Ferry Building, and the cross-streets are still open.
I was worried it was going to extend further, since I use the Octavia exit to Market to Franklin to get to the SFJazz venue and other places, but I can still use Market for that.
Cabs can still use it but not Uber/Lyft cars, and I guess they're going to add more buses & trolly's. Still, I'm not really sure what the true point of it is, since as others have said not many people use that stretch of Market to drive.
I guess maybe it's just another way for San Francisco to "make a point."
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call" Knotesau
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 01:34 pm
It's to cut down on deaths.
It's to cut down on deaths.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Barrel Aged jamjuice
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 01:42 pm
>>What's that Elon Musk up to
>>What's that Elon Musk up to out there anyway ?
Yesterday, he toured a 3-D printing facility where my friend works. They do a lot of super-geeky, high-tech stuff for SpaceX.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Dr. Benway daylight
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 01:43 pm
if youre an adult who has not
if youre an adult who has not yet learned how to look both ways and safely cross the street, you probably are not long for this world anyway.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius Thom2
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 01:45 pm
I'm glad that I lived there
I'm glad that I lived there in the 70's.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Dr. Benway daylight
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 01:57 pm
the needles and poop trope is
the needles and poop trope is pretty overblown, but there are a few areas where that kinda stuff does happen. a good section of the mission and the tenderloin do live up to the hype, but thats like 10% of the city...the rest of the city is really nice, super clean, etc.
the needle issue is actually due to an error made in the administration of needle exchange programs, where instead of being a needle exchange, they are just giving them out willy nilly. a nice example of classic SF over liberalizing, it seems like some city officials thought that by not requiring dirty needles to be exchanged for clean needles, they would be able to reduce the spread of blood borne disease even further by reducing a barrier to obtaining clean needles - having to keep and turn in your dirty rigs.
and they are probably right - there are probably more junkies using city provided clean needles than there would be if the city required a true exchange to obtain needles.
and as anyone with experience with junk could tell you, the junkies nodding on the corner now have an unlimited supply of needles and no incentive to clean up after themselves.
it would be easy to look at the situation and revert to standard conservative thinking, that to get rid of the needles the city needs to stop giving them out, needle exchange experiment failed.
id recommend they look at some of the nordic countries like sweden that have centers where drug users can take their drugs and inject them using a clean rig under the supervision of nurses/medical professionals, with narcan on hand. in the areas where these programs are in place, the numbers on overdose deaths have dropped more than just about any other tactic used to cure opiate OD's the world over.
you still get to curb the spread of blood borne disease by giving people free needles, you drastically reduce overdose deaths, and the needles never see the street because they do not leave the facility.
the poop thing tho, idk man. theres no easy answer and in those small areas like part of the mission and the loin, the poop trope is very real. id guess a large percentage of it is due to very favorable weather for homeless people combined with the city's insistence on people not doing drugs in restrooms, so they just dont install public restrooms. because poop on the streets is fine but god forbid someone whose life is utterly and irrevocably destroyed find some solace in a shot of tar on the floor of a portapoty.
so you'd rather they do it openly on the street? and then shit in the gutters?
offering designated areas for drug injection could allow for the placement of more public restrooms in problem areas without the need for as much management and maintenence. at the same time tho i think they should just let people do drugs in the bathrooms.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Dr. Benway daylight
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 02:07 pm
as an adult its easy to find
as an adult its easy to find a restroom but when i was a teenager out in SF, no business would allow us to use the restroom without buying something, so i ended up pissing all over the streets - alleys, flower beds, the BART tracks, whatever. it used to blow my mind that people would always complain SF smells like piss, but its impossible for someone who does not look like a respectable adult or have extra money to find a place to pee.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Johnny D skudebro
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 04:49 pm
I use the public restroom at
I use the public restroom at People's Park, Berkeley quite often.
It's not a pretty picture...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Racketinmyhead Racketinmyhead
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 05:10 pm
The new trend around here is
The new trend around here are the animals piss in the elevators of the metro train stations.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: _________ Plf9905
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 05:11 pm
Market St ? Just Get To The
Market St ? Just Get To The Warfield to SEE Phil ...... 9~25~03_______ ! anyone have a link to this show ?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Hitchhiker awaiting "true call" Knotesau
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 05:14 pm
Who uses transit elevators
Who uses transit elevators besides socialists?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Woz Paul_woz
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 05:46 pm
Wondering how this is going
Wondering how this is going over with the locals?
We're fine with it and it is long overdue. This proposal and similar ones have been bandied about for years now.....decades even.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: An organ grinder’s tune Turtle
on Friday, February 14, 2020 – 05:51 pm
racket is going to not claim
racket is going to not claim social security when eligible out of principle....