Currently in the midst of "Grant" (Chernow) & can't help but think about Trumpers

Forums:

... in light of Sherman's strategy of "total warfare" as being necessary to take the wind out of South (I'm currently at the beginning of his march to Savannah).

Certainly not suggesting the nation picks up arms (at this point anyhow), but can't help but wonder if they're simply too attached to their "narrative" to EVER abandon it without incurring a sufficient amount of pain for engaging in a reckless endangerment of The Rule of Law?!?

I know it's a grim thought, but it might very well be the reality of the situation.

My hope is there will be irrefutable evidence of massive corruption on Trump's part that simply can't be denied. 

 

This is a good example of TDS Level 4. I recently counseled a close friend who is also suffering from the condition. He told me with total conviction that "Trump will be the last POTUS!"

Luckily, I walked him through the basic mechanics of the three braches of American government, how elections work, and a brief history of the American Revolution. Eventually, I was able to talk him down. Still, I noticed his lip was still trembling when I left him alone with his vodka. TDS is very, very real.

Lets hope the system works as intended; however, McConnell is proving how "total warfare" in the Senate can subvert the Constitutional guardrails we've long been accustomed to protecting the system from imploding and having something other than a Republic entrenched and weilding power.

 

 

Are you willing to accept Mueller's findings, or does he have to "prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt" as Bryen had mentioned in another thread?

 

>>>>>>Certainly not suggesting the nation picks up arms (at this point anyhow), 

 

You think the Trump opposition is armed? 

There's nothing funnier than a progressive leftist projecting fantasies of totalitarianism  onto the opposition.  It's like you've never read a  history book not written by Howard Zinn.

 >>>Are you willing to accept Mueller's findings, or does he have to "prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt" as Bryen had mentioned in another thread?

 

I'm interested to read his findings, for sure. 

What concerns me about your thread is how you got to a place where you consider the potential outcome of the Trump presidency to be armed conflict. That's pretty ridiculous.

>>>>You think the Trump opposition is armed?

https://www.vivalazone.org/other-stuff/armed-leftists

They are getting started, but might take some catching up.

Of course, this country already had one civil war and it wouldn't do anybody any good to have another:

Civil War dead_1.jpg

because...nazis were liberals...

what are the history books we should read?

 

ps. practiced some 9mm target shooting.

 

you know they feel the same antipathy (i guess that's better than "hatred") towards you, right? and just a hunch that if violence is initiated towards them, they are better armed & trained than your side, right? it's scary reading the back & forth arguing in the article comments sections. people have lost their minds

What concerns me about your thread is how you got to a place where you consider the potential outcome of the Trump presidency to be armed conflict. That's pretty ridiculous.<<<

Are you suggesting the two competing "narratives" are compatible and are able to co-exist indefinitely?

>>>>>>>> they are better armed & trained than your side, right? 

 

You got a lot of Cesar Sayocs on your side, Hill. 

it aint my side pal. 

>>>Are you suggesting the two competing "narratives" are compatible and are able to co-exist indefinitely?

 

I'm suggesting irrational people should take their meds and STFU so the rest of us can get on with our lives.

My next door neighbors voted for Trump, I voted for Hillary. We still say hello and talk about how much the Broncos suck this season. They look out for our shit, and we look out for theirs. That's how this works.

Of course, this country already had one civil war and it wouldn't do anybody any good to have another<<<

I agree wholeheartedly, especially being at the stage in the book after Cold Harbor and as the siege of Richmond begins -> the slaughter goes up exponentially.

Definitely not routing for it, not hardly ... but at this point I can't help but wonder how in the world Trumpers will EVER be swayed with words?  Their "narrative" (i.e. deep state silent coup) is being leveraged as a sort of "conspiracy backstop catchall" that can always be twisted to accommodate new developments that might otherwise run contrary to their predetermined conclusions.

Looking to the future, in terms of a logical convergence:  unless there's a grand realization moment with irrefutable proof  (i.e. Face in the Crowd w/ Andy Griffith), Trumpers are going to continually move the goal posts pertaining to facts in order to preserve their original platform.

I'm suggesting irrational people should take their meds and STFU so the rest of us can get on with our lives.

My next door neighbors voted for Trump, I voted for Hillary. We still say hello and talk about how much the Broncos suck this season. They look out for our shit, and we look out for theirs. That's how this works.

That's how it works, "now".

I give you slack for telling to STFU, because I understand it's a difficult thing to digest; for if you did go about your "everyday life" with a sober assessment of the future in terms of the logical outcome playing out ... it'd be difficult to go on as if everything is OK.  

it's perfect. we keep bickering and hating each other instead of the actual architects and purveyors of oppression.

i hope that we can collectively keep our civility towards one another. 

what THEY don't want you to know, is that the people on the left and the right are pushed so far to the ends of their spectrums, they almost touch.

 

i never read news article type of commentary from users. its fucking insane and brings out the worst in people.

 

>>> There's nothing funnier than a progressive leftist projecting fantasies of totalitarianism  onto the opposition. <<<

Thom, there's nothing funnier? Is the the totality of your humor? Come on, you can find humor better than that, can't you?

Russia promotes both the extreme right and the extreme left, and encourages them to hate each other.

It would be nice if we could find some common ground.

Imagine a world where the tea party and occupy movements realized they were actually close enough to saying the same thing that they united forces into a new unified American movement

(Squirrel)

I'd like to take this opportunity to thank corporate america for making sure most grass roots movements fail or look like idiots with well crafted stories and photos to help assist in the demonification of any threat perceived or otherwise....   (and the ones that remain are like crumbs to keep us content in the feeling we've done something)

>>>>Russia promotes both the extreme right and the extreme left, and encourages them to hate each other

More and more, this seems to be what is going on.  Who really benefits from all the discord and hate?

I keep thinking about that old Star Trek episode "Day of the Dove" where a mysterious force pits the crew of the Enterprise against a ship of captured Klingons goading them to butcher each other with swords, feeding off the hate.

jmathis_4.jpg
"I am so enthusiastic about your political opinions,  that I made several Gold Records.."

I've been "laughing at the alien life force" all this time, but have met very few (if any) Trump supporters are willing to join in.

There's no hate, but definitely a lot of frustration.

Likewise, I have no real ideological political opinion at stake; other than looking out for the Rule of Law.

Many are still willing to provide political support / cover to representatives who continue to abdicate their executive oversight responsibilities by not opposing seditious language that is being generated ad nauseum and may ultimately assist in subverting the Rule of Law.

None of us really knows the entire story at this point, but to not even consider the possibility that the POTUS may have been compromised by a foreign adversary is more than reckless.   IMO, there's a form of a "mental illness" at play ... it's just an observation, not a judgment.   We're all "guilty" of having the same decision making apparatus that swings to various extremes (or maybe even stays on center "too much").   But the point being:  make no mistake, what's going on with Trump supporters will only end when their constructs are either entirely broken down by utter and complete defeat (which will likely involve both "sides") or they succeed.   Logically, I don't see much in the way of middle ground ... unless the evidence is just so overwhelming / convincing ... and even then, there will still be true believers who will re-frame the narrative and deepen the conspiracy.

 

The tRumpsters will get over the conspiracy theories in due time, especially if they have new targets to aim at (Pelosi!).

Remember, the same crew was convinced Obama was going to take their guns. So, now they're wringing their hands about the Derp State Conspiracy. They'll get over that, too, once the trumpster is voted out (or gets to 2024...who knows).

FOM...haven't you spit-balled the theory that tRump will declare Marshall Law and halt elections etc? Aren't you as guilty of fanning the flames as anyone?

Oh, and "quotes".

Martial.

OK Mr. FancyPants

The tRumpsters will get over the conspiracy theories in due time, especially if they have new targets to aim at (Pelosi!).

Remember, the same crew was convinced Obama was going to take their guns. So, now they're wringing their hands about the Derp State Conspiracy. They'll get over that, too, once the trumpster is voted out (or gets to 2024...who knows).

FOM...haven't you spit-balled the theory that tRump will declare Marshall Law and halt elections etc? Aren't you as guilty of fanning the flames as anyone?<<<

ned, I believe your analysis has some truth; in so far as if we somehow get past Trump, there being a very large percentage of "internet tough guys" who effectively go silent in terms of not taking any action.  In a certain sense, these people will be the biggest "cowards" in so far as having been willing to accept the deep state narrative for opposing the Rule of Law, yet when the chips are down, they'll simply fold their hands and slip in to the shadows.

However, your calculation appears to omit the possibility of the regular stream of BS / propaganda from Trump and this glorified megaphone to have an effect on at least some of his followers (much more so than when Trump was just the "lead birther on the sidelines").  Thousand Oaks, Pittsburg, FL, etc. etc. (and etc.) might look like a drop in the bucket compared to what could materialize from even the smallest percentage of the "diehard true believers" who are willing to act upon their pent up anger and hate; AND who retain the misguided belief that there is a "deep state" working behind the scenes.

Is it fanning the flames to try and show the Thom's of the equation what the "ghost of christmas future" might look like on this front if they continue on their trajectory of complicity?   Not looking to double dare him, but I believe he'd ultimately be one to creep back into the shadows ... yet I've read many non-political posts that indicate to me that there is a "good person" inside of him; and in turn, I can't help but believe there's a part of him that struggles with the political questions at some level (even if it's deep in sub-consious). 

 

Or, to metaphorically illustrate the "ghost of christmas future" with a picture:   what happens when the (internet tough guy) "narrative" intersects with "reality"?

bartman_two_wide-56403dfc64de86946037e5d35c47c0c91826c70a_0.jpg