Its the FBI.s fault...again

Forums:

Justice, FBI to be investigated over Clinton probes

 

The Justice Department inspector general on Thursday announced that it will launch an investigation into the FBI’s conduct leading up to the 2016 elections.

The probe, which comes in response to requests from numerous chairmen and ranking members of congressional oversight committees, will look into allegations that Director James Comey broke bureau policy with his various public disclosures regarding the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/314002-justice-department-in...puttin_0.jpg

billll.jpg

 

They need to investigate the meeting between Lynch and the creepy rapist husband on the airport tarmac when the corrupt lying wife is being investigated by the FBI

 

they talked about golf

and grand kids..

 

we can believe the creepy rapist husband..

he would never lie..

^not placing blame, but Comey may have been in violation of the Hatch Act. I understand that you are unconcerned as you are an ideologue and care little for our democracy and the rule of law

and Hillary Clinton is in violation of many laws..

she should be indicted and convicted then placed in a cage where she and her corrupt family belong..

 

hillary jail_1.jpg

 

 

^The FBI disagrees and Congressional Republicans have found nothing despite years of investigations

By using this website, you agree to vivalazone.org/.com’s Rules, including avoiding the following:

 

~-~ slander/libel, harmful, incriminating, or purposely disruptive secondhand information, unsubstantiated hearsay, gossip, ugly rumors

^^^ This!

lander/libel, harmful, incriminating, or purposely disruptive secondhand information, unsubstantiated hearsay, gossip, ugly rumors >>

 

unless about President Donald Trump

 

then the rules do not apply

 

poor guys

The FBI disagrees and Congressional Republicans have found nothing despite years of investigations

 

When caught, Hillary alleged that she “never sent any classified material nor received any marked classified.” This turned out to be a lie. Hillary claimed before becoming secretary she had merely wanted only one device “for convenience.” This turned out to be lie. The FBI found that Clinton “used numerous mobile devices,” not to mention servers. Clinton — the most competent person to ever run for president, according to Barack Obama — claimed she didn’t understand how classified markings work. This was also a lie.

According to the FBI, Hillary sent 110 emails containing clearly marked classified information. Thirty-six of these emails contained secret information.Eight of those email chains contained “top secret” information.

“We assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account,” Comey said at his press conference in July. He acknowledged this could have happened because Hillary and her staff were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.” He also admitted that no competent foreign power would have left behind evidence of this hack. Yet, for some reason, Comey would not admit that this is why U.S. Code makes mishandling information — not the intent of those mishandling it — illegal.

 

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.

With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.”

 

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

 

Hillary Clinton utilized multiple “different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.” So she was lying when she said that she only set up the system so that she could use one handheld device.

 

From the very beginning of her tenure as secretary of State, Clinton signed a non-disclosure agreement acknowledging that it was her responsibility to ascertain whether documents contained sensitive information. She also acknowledged the criminal penalties she would face if she disclosed government secrets.

 

ClintoWikiLeaks Surfaces Scathing Review of Clinton Foundation for 'Quid Pro Quo'n Foundation 'a criminal enterprise'

 

How the Clinton Foundation Got Rich off Poor Haitians

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437883/hillarys-america-secret-his...

 

Clinton Foundation is an ‘organized criminal enterprise’

 

"Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions", Analyst Charges In Stunning Takedown

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-07/clinton-foundation-charity-frau...

 

 

 

 

Dead2,


You appear to disagree that the Justice Department is investigating allegations.

 

Why is that a bad thing?

 

If they find that Comey or other FBI members did nothing wrong, then you can gloat about how wrong they were to look into it.

 

If they find damning evidence, you can start a thread about how crooked they are to make "fake news" about things they made up in their shady ways.


Win-Win situation for you, Buddy.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/01/13/report-flynn-phoned-russi...

The Washington Post on Thursday and the Associated Press on Friday both reported that Retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn repeatedly phoned the Russian ambassador to the U.S. on the very same day the Obama administration expelled 35 Russian diplomats over election hacking. The allegation, made by an unnamed senior U.S. government official, raises the question of whether Flynn, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for national-security adviser, was in violation of federal law with this alleged phone call. As author David Ignatius notes, the Logan Act prohibits U.S. citizens from any communication that is meant to influence a foreign government involved in disputes with the U.S.

...