2nd-highest Court in the land, I think. (US Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit). I don't suppose the current Supreme court would overturn. So now it is fine for cops to come on your property and shoot you and your dog for no reason at all other than they were looking for someone else?
>>> You want to condemn all police for the actions of this guy you might as well do the same for every other group of professionals. <<<
If "this guy" were the only policeman shooting children, or innocent people, or random people of color, your argument might cause a person pause. He's not. It's institutionalized, it's everywhere, it's wrong. It's murder. There's nothing to be said that might make it okay.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: jazfish
(((Bruce)))
Edit
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: good at drinking water
2nd-highest Court in the land
2nd-highest Court in the land, I think. (US Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit). I don't suppose the current Supreme court would overturn. So now it is fine for cops to come on your property and shoot you and your dog for no reason at all other than they were looking for someone else?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: MarkD
Sieg Heil!
Sieg Heil!
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Thomas O' Bagenhammers
There's bad people in every
There's bad people in every profession. It's called being human.
You want to condemn all police for the actions of this guy you might as well do the same for every other group of professionals.
And I'd love to see you folks survive in a world without police.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Where Does The Time Go?
>>>> There's bad people in
>>>> There's bad people in every profession. It's called being human.
Thom is fine with a police officer trying to shoot his dog and instead shooting his child.
i think that's what he's saying.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Mice elf
true.
true.
I have heard of some super shitty librarians in my day.
Probably best if we didn’t give them a license to kill, either.
3/10 for use of you people
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: long live the dead
“You folks”
“You folks”
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: long live the dead
^ I guess that just about
^ I guess that just about says it all
maybe there is still a point in attempting rational discourse
but I like pissing in the wind sometimes
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Rando
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozeuu0PaOxg
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: good at drinking water
Kind of fun when the National
Kind of fun when the National Review slaps Thom around.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/07/a-dreadful-police-shooting-highlights-the-need-to-change-a-terrible-law/
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: 19.5 Degrees
And I'd love to see you folks
And I'd love to see you folks survive in a world without police<<<
Meanwhile, why do you continually engage in the equivalent of "reckless manslaughter" as it relates to the wholesale demise of the Rule of Law?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Thumbkinetic
Poor Thom. Fuck Thom.
Poor Thom.Fuck Thom.Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: treat island
>>> You want to condemn all
>>> You want to condemn all police for the actions of this guy you might as well do the same for every other group of professionals. <<<
If "this guy" were the only policeman shooting children, or innocent people, or random people of color, your argument might cause a person pause. He's not. It's institutionalized, it's everywhere, it's wrong. It's murder. There's nothing to be said that might make it okay.